数字经济赋能新质生产力发展的内在机理与提升路径研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.安庆师范大学 经济与管理学院,安徽 安庆 246133;2.河北经贸大学 经济学院,河北 石家庄 050061

作者简介:

余卫,安庆师范大学经济与管理学院讲师,硕士研究生导师,Email:davieyu@126.com。

中图分类号:

F49;F124

基金项目:

安徽省高校科研重点项目“新质生产力统计测度理论与应用研究”(2024AH052750);国家社会科学基金项目“多元利益视角下农地细碎化协同治理机制研究”(23BGL264);河南省软科学项目“乡村振兴视域下河南省城乡‘数字鸿沟’的成因、特征与弥合机制研究”(242400410042)


Research on the internal mechanism and improvement path of digital economy empowering the development of new quality productivity
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Economics and Management, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, P. R. China;2.School of Economics, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, P. R. China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [31]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    新质生产力已经在实践中形成并展示出对高质量发展的强劲推动力、支撑力,而数字经济的快速发展为生产力的蝶变跃升提供了技术支持和产业根基,成为培育新质生产力的核心动能。因此,厘清数字经济作用于新质生产力的内在机理,探究二者之间的逻辑关联,对于因地制宜发展新质生产力、推动经济社会高质量发展具有重要意义。文章基于2012—2021年全国30个省份的面板数据,以马克思主义生产力理论为指导,紧紧围绕新质生产力的核心内涵,从新质劳动者、新质劳动对象和新质劳动资料三个维度构建测度新质生产力发展水平的评价指标体系,深入探究了数字经济对新质生产力发展的影响效应和作用机制。研究发现:数字经济对新质生产力具有显著正向的促进作用,这一结论经过内生性及稳健性检验后依然成立;异质性检验结果表明,数字经济对新质生产力的赋能作用在我国东中西部均有效,且在西部地区表现出更为强劲的赋能作用,但是在东北地区并不显著,可能是由于东北地区数字基础设施相对薄弱、人口外流、产业转型缓慢等原因造成的;机制检验结果显示,数字经济可以通过加速市场化改革进程和推动产业结构高级化两条路径促进新质生产力发展;门槛效应揭示,数字经济对新质生产力发展的影响并不是线性的,而是存在着明显的门槛效应,且随着数字经济发展水平的提升而显著增强。据此,文章提出要大力发展数字经济,为培育新质生产力提供坚实的技术支撑和创新动能;要加快市场化改革进程,为新质生产力的培育提供良好的营商环境和制度保障;要加快产业结构优化调整,为新质生产力的培育提供稳固的产业根基和平台效能。从学理角度而言,文章搭建了数字经济与新质生产力有机关联的互动分析框架,回应了众多学者提出的二者实证分析不足的研究缺憾;从实践角度而言,文章提出的政策建议能够更加充分发挥数字经济的独特效能,为推动新质生产力加快形成提供参考借鉴。

    Abstract:

    New quality productivity has formed and demonstrated in practice as a strong driving force and support for high-quality development, and the rapid development of the digital economy has provided technical support and industrial foundation for the leap of productivity, becoming the core driving force for cultivating new quality productivity. Therefore, clarifying the internal mechanism of the role of digital economy in new quality productivity and exploring the logical relationship between the two are of great significance for developing new quality productivity according to local conditions and promoting high-quality economic and social development. The article is based on panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2012 to 2021, guided by Marxist productivity theory, and closely focused on the core connotation of new quality productivity. It constructs an evaluation index system to measure the development level of new quality productivity from three dimensions: new quality workers, new quality labor objects, and new quality labor materials, and deeply explores the impact and mechanism of digital economy on the development of new quality productivity. Research has found that: 1) Digital economy has a significant positive promoting effect on new quality productivity, and this conclusion still holds true after endogeneity and robustness tests; 2) The heterogeneity test results indicate that the empowering effect of digital economy on new quality productivity is effective in the eastern, central, and western regions of China, and shows a stronger empowering effect in the western region. However, it is not significant in the northeast region. This may be due to the relatively weak digital infrastructure, population outflow, and slow industrial transformation in the northeast region; 3) The mechanism test results show that digital economy can promote the development of new quality productivity through two paths: accelerating the process of market-oriented reform and promoting the upgrading of industrial structure; 4) The threshold effect reveals that the impact of digital economy on the development of new quality productivity is not linear, but rather has a significant threshold effect, which increases significantly with the improvement of the level of digital economy development. Based on this, the article proposes to vigorously develop digital economy, providing solid technical support and innovative momentum for cultivating new quality productivity; To accelerate the process of market-oriented reform and provide a favorable business environment and institutional guarantee for the cultivation of new quality productive forces; To accelerate the optimization and adjustment of industrial structure, and provide a solid industrial foundation and platform efficiency for the cultivation of new quality productivity. From the theoretical perspective, the article establishes an interactive analysis framework for the organic correlation between the digital economy and new quality productivity, responding to the research shortcomings raised by many scholars regarding the insufficient empirical analysis of the two; From the practical perspective, the policy recommendations proposed in the article can fully leverage the unique effectiveness of digital economy and provide reference for accelerating the formation of new quality productivity.

    参考文献
    [1] 张森,温军.数字经济赋能新质生产力:一个分析框架[J].当代经济管理,2024(7):1-9.
    [2] 周文,叶蕾.新质生产力与数字经济[J].浙江工商大学学报,2024(2):17-28.
    [3] 焦勇,齐梅霞.数字经济赋能新质生产力发展[J].经济与管理评论,2024(3):17-30.
    [4] 张夏恒.数字经济加速新质生产力生成的内在逻辑与实现路径[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2024(3):1-14.
    [5] 任保平,豆渊博.新质生产力:文献综述与研究展望[J].经济与管理评论,2024(3):5-16.
    [6] 徐政,郑霖豪,程梦瑶.新质生产力助力高质量发展:优势条件、关键问题和路径选择[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2023(6):12-22.
    [7] 王国成,程振锋.新质生产力与基本经济模态转换[J].当代经济科学,2024(3):71-79.
    [8] 崔云.数字技术促进新质生产力发展探析[J].世界社会主义研究,2023(12):97-109, 120.
    [9] 刘友金,冀有幸.发展新质生产力须当拼在数字经济新赛道[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024(1):89-99.
    [10] 裴长洪,倪江飞,李越.数字经济的政治经济学分析[J].财贸经济,2018(9):5-22.
    [11] 陈晓红,李杨扬,宋丽洁,等.数字经济理论体系与研究展望[J].管理世界,2022(2): 208-224,13-16.
    [12] 吴文生,荣义,吴华清.数字经济赋能新质生产力发展:基于长三角城市群的研究[J].金融与经济,2024(4):15-27.
    [13] 王文泽.以智能制造作为新质生产力支撑引领现代化产业体系建设[J].当代经济研究,2024(2):105-115.
    [14] 胡莹.新质生产力的内涵、特点及路径探析[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(5):36-45,2.
    [15] 石建勋,徐玲.加快形成新质生产力的重大战略意义及实现路径研究[J].财经问题研究,2024(1):3-12.
    [16] 罗爽,肖韵.数字经济核心产业集聚赋能新质生产力发展:理论机制与实证检验[J].新疆社会科学,2024(2):29-40,148.
    [17] 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023(10):1-13.
    [18] 姚震宇.区域市场化水平与数字经济竞争:基于数字经济指数省际空间分布特征的分析[J].江汉论坛,2020(12):23-33.
    [19] 任晓刚,李冠楠,王锐.数字经济发展、要素市场化与区域差距变化[J].中国流通经济,2022(1):55-70.
    [20] 庞瑞芝.新质生产力的核心产业形态及培育[J].人民论坛,2023(21):18-21.
    [21] 陈永强,张昕钰.数字经济发展对地区产业结构优化的影响机制:基于2011—2019年省级面板数据的实证分析[J].财经论丛,2023(4):14-23.
    [22] 迟明园,石雅楠.数字经济促进产业结构优化升级的影响机制及对策[J].经济纵横,2022(4):122-128.
    [23] 魏崇辉.新质生产力的基本意涵、历史演进与实践路径[J].理论与改革,2023(6):25-38.
    [24] 卢江,郭子昂,王煜萍.新质生产力发展水平、区域差异与提升路径[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2024(3):1-17.
    [25] 王珏,王荣基.新质生产力:指标构建与时空演进[J].西安财经大学学报,2024(1):31-47.
    [26] 范合君,吴婷.中国数字化程度测度与指标体系构建[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2020(4):3-12.
    [27] 吴翌琳.国家数字竞争力指数构建与国际比较研究[J].统计研究,2019(11):14-25.
    [28] 金灿阳,徐蔼婷,邱可阳.中国省域数字经济发展水平测度及其空间关联研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2022(6):11-21.
    [29] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展:来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020(10):65-76.
    [30] 樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数:各地区市场化相对进程报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.
    [31] 干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究, 2011(5):4-16,31.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

余卫,赵皖渝,赵彤彤.数字经济赋能新质生产力发展的内在机理与提升路径研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2025,31(3):90-104. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2024.12.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:120
  • 下载次数: 184
  • HTML阅读次数: 51
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-15
文章二维码