博士学位论文评价的基本原则与价值维度
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.西南大学 教育学部,重庆 400715;2.河南财政金融学院 教育科学学院,河南 郑州 450046

作者简介:

徐辉,博士,西南大学教育学部教授,Email:skcxh@swu.edu.cn
张永富,博士,河南财政金融学院教育科学学院讲师。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G643.8

基金项目:

第一批新时代教育部马工程重点建设项目(24JZDMG-XSD-060)


Basic principle and value dimension of doctoral dissertation evaluation
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, P. R. China;2.College of Educational Science, Henan Finance University, Zhengzhou 450046, P. R. China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    博士生教育是我国国民教育体系中最高一级的教育,代表着国民教育的最高水平;博士人才是推动社会创新发展的中坚力量,是国家核心竞争力的重要体现。博士学位论文是学位申请者在攻读博士学位期间最为重要的学习和学术研究成果,是综合评价、衡量博士研究生学习和研究能力的最主要也是最重要的依据;综合而论,加强博士生教育,促进博士人才在国家创新发展过程中发挥引领作用,必须科学合理地进行博士学位论文评价。博士学位论文评价是主观性与客观性并存的命题,不同主体依照不同的视角往往能够得到不同的评价标准,这些标准有着自身特殊的存在依据,并在一定范围内实施。同时,这些标准也都依照着博士学位论文固有的价值要求,满足博士学位论文评价的客观标准。事实上,学位论文评价的基本原则是展开博士学位论文评价所依据的法则和依据,有助于实现博士学位论文评价的过程规范。学位论文的价值取向,决定着各项评价指标的具体配置,支配着学位申请者的主观价值抉择。把控好博士学位论文评价的价值维度,才能从操作层面制约博士生教育评价各项指标体系,引导各培养单位从根源上遏制博士研究生培养质量下滑的趋势。随着社会的进步和科技的发展,学位与研究生教育评估理论与技术也出现了新的进展,我国原有的博士学位论文评价体系滞后于现时代的发展,亟待作出相应的调适。新时代博士学位论文评价应当遵循目标导向与问题导向相结合的原则,过程评价、结果评价和增值评价相结合的原则,分类评价与聚合性评价相结合的原则。最为核心的评价价值维度应聚焦于三个层面、九个方面。三个层面为:学术知识的创新、学术技能的习得、学术修养的养成。九个方面指:系统性的基础知识、精深的专业知识和创新性知识;发现问题的能力、科学研究的能力和独立写作的能力;学术意识、学术道德和学术实践。

    Abstract:

    Doctoral education is the highest level of education in the Chinese educational system.Doctoral talents are the backbone of promoting social innovation and development and an important embodiment of the country's core competitiveness. The doctoral dissertation is the most important learning and academic research achievement of doctoral candidates.It is the most essential basis for the comprehensive evaluation and measurement of doctoral candidates' learning and research ability.Overall, it is necessary to evaluate doctoral dissertations in a scientific and reasonable way so as to strengthen doctoral education, and promote doctoral talents to play a leading role in China's innovation and development.The evaluation of doctoral dissertations is both subjective and objective. Different subjects can obtain distinct evaluation criteria according to various perspectives. These criteria have their own special bases and are implemented within a certain range. Meanwhile, these criteria are in accordance with the intrinsic value requirements of doctoral dissertations and meet their appraisal standards. In fact, basic principles are the rules and standards through which the evaluation of doctoral dissertations is carried out so as to standardize the evaluation process.Value orientation of dissertations determines the specific configuration of each evaluation index and dominates the subjective value choice of degree applicants.Controlling the value dimension of doctoral dissertation evaluation contributes to restricting the index system of doctoral education evaluation from the operational level and guiding training units to curb the decline of training quality of doctoral talents. With the development of science and technology, the theory and technology of degree and postgraduate education evaluation have also made new progress. The original evaluation system of doctoral dissertations in China lags behind the development of the current era, and it is urgent to make corresponding adjustments. Nowadays, the evaluation of doctoral dissertations should follow the principles of combination of goal and problem orientation, connection of process, outcome and value-added evaluation, association of classified and comprehensive evaluation. The core value of the evaluation should focus on three levels and nine aspects. The three levels are innovation in academic knowledge, acquisition of academic skills, development of academic accomplishments. The nine aspects include the systematic basic knowledge, in-depth professional knowledge, innovative knowledge, ability to discover problems, scientific research ability, independent writing ability, academic awareness, academic ethics and academic practice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐辉,张永富.博士学位论文评价的基本原则与价值维度[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2025,31(3):149-161. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2024.12.012

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码