抗战胜利前后中国工业标准化运动和参与创建国际标准化组织
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中央民族大学 历史文化学院,北京 100081

作者简介:

李俊杰,历史学博士,中央民族大学历史文化学院讲师。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

K26;F424

基金项目:

《中国工程标准协进会推行工业标准化旨趣》(1942年),“中研院”近史所档案馆藏,经济部档案,18-22-01-061-03。


China’s industrial standardization movement before and after the victory of the War Against Japanese Aggression and participation in the creation of the International Organization for Standardization
Author:
Affiliation:

School of History and Culture, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, P. R. China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    工业标准化是工业化的重要内容,是规模化生产和科学管理的结果。全面抗战前,受西方列强向中国出口的影响,中国工业材料来自多国,因此工业标准不一。全面抗战时期,国人意识到工业标准在工业发展中发挥着重要作用,其可以节省人力物力财力,提高工作效率,便于分工合作大量生产和工业动员,促进工业普及化,从而提高工业化水平。战时国民政府从促进战后工业建设的角度考量工业标准化问题,其目的是便于统一进口国外机器设备的标准;按照一定标准向国外出口农矿产品,提高出口商品的国际信用;使国防工业与民生工业打成一片。抗战胜利前后,国民政府积极参与国际标准化事务,其中最为重要的事件是参与创建联合国标准协调委员会和国际标准化组织(ISO),其策略是要求保留各国在工业标准制定上的自主权,以便工业落后国家保护本国幼稚工业,避免中国战后成为美国经济的附庸。鉴于中国是农业国家,国民政府主张ISO应多设农产品技术委员会,试图争取在中国设置五个分委会秘书处,并且建议设立茶叶分委会。总体而言,抗战胜利前后,国民政府和工业界、科学界人士不遗余力地促进中国工业标准化,一方面是在民族主义刺激下,希望利用工业标准化直接借鉴工业先进国家的经验,使用最新式技术进行大量生产,以最短时间“迎头赶上”工业先进国家;另一方面中国工业标准化运动与1940年代计划经济思潮相契合,通过制定工业标准能够实现各部门的配合,有助于战后有计划地进行工业建设。但是,由于战后国民党发动内战,通货膨胀严重,政治经济局势动荡不安,加之国际贸易恢复缓慢,中国工业未能得到迅速发展,工业标准化亦难以顺利推行。

    Abstract:

    Industrial standardization is an important part of industrialization and the result of large-scale production and scientific management. Before the War Against Japanese Aggression, influenced by the export of Western powers to China, China’s industrial materials came from many countries, so industrial standards were different. During the War Against Japanese Aggression, the Chinese people realized that industrial standards played an important role in industrial development. They could save manpower, material and financial resources, improve work efficiency, facilitate division of labor and cooperation in mass production and industrial mobilization, and promote industrial popularization, thereby improving the level of industrialization. The National Government considered the issue of industrial standardization from the perspective of promoting post-war industrial construction. Its purpose was to facilitate the unification of standards for importing foreign machinery and equipment; export agricultural and mineral products to foreign countries according to certain standards, improve the international credit of export commodities; and integrate the national defense industry with the people’s livelihood industry. Before and after the victory of the War Against Japanese Aggression, the National Government actively participated in international standardization affairs. The most important event was its participation in the establishment of the United Nations Standards Coordinating Committee and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Its strategy was to require countries to retain their autonomy in the formulation of industrial standards so that industrially backward countries could protect their own immature industries and avoid China becoming a vassal of the US economy after the war. Given that China is an agricultural country, the National Government advocated that ISO should set up more technical committees for agricultural product standards, tried to set up five subcommittee secretariats in China, and suggested the establishment of a tea subcommittee. In general, before and after the victory of the War Against Japanese Aggression, the National Government and people in the industrial and scientific communities spared no effort to promote China’s industrial standardization. On the one hand, stimulated by nationalism, they hoped to use industrial standardization to directly learn from the experience of industrially advanced countries, use the latest technology for mass production, and catch up with industrially advanced countries in the shortest time. On the other hand, China’s industrial standardization movement was in line with the planned economic thought of the 1940s. By formulating industrial standards, it was possible to achieve cooperation among various departments, which would help to carry out planned industrial construction after the war. However, due to the civil war launched by the Kuomintang after the war, severe inflation, unstable political and economic situation, and slow recovery of international trade, China’s industry failed to develop rapidly and industrial standardization was difficult to implement smoothly.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李俊杰.抗战胜利前后中国工业标准化运动和参与创建国际标准化组织[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2025,31(4):162-174. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. rw.2025.05.002

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码