要素创新、产业数字化与区域协调发展——基于新质生产力视角的研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.兰州财经大学,“一带一路”经济研究院,甘肃 兰州 730020;2.兰州财经大学,经济学院,甘肃 兰州 730020

作者简介:

通讯作者:

王娟娟(通信作者),兰州财经大学“一带一路”经济研究院二级教授,硕士研究生导师,Email:wjj_0803@163.com。

中图分类号:

F127

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“产业数字化赋能区域经济发展的效应研究”(23BJL118)


Factor innovation, industrial digitization and regional coordinated development: A study based on the perspective of new quality productivity
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Economic Research Institute of the Belt and Road Initiative, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730020, P.R.China;2.School of Economics, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730020, P.R.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    区域协调发展是中国区域经济学的重要内容,是中国式现代化的重要体现,而产业是实现目标的主要载体,在数字经济时代,产业发展必须以数据信息为依据。党的二十届三中全会提出,健全促进实体经济和数字经济深度融合制度,完善区域协调发展战略机制。2024年中央经济工作会议明确要求,积极运用数字技术、绿色技术改造提升传统产业,提升经济发展优势区域的创新能力和辐射带动作用。立足四大区域处于不同发展阶段的现实,以我国31省(市、区)为研究样本,运用熵值法对2003—2023年的要素创新、产业数字化与区域协调发展水平进行实证分析。由于自2013年开始我国数字经济发展进入成熟期,因此以要素创新为解释变量、区域协调发展水平为被解释变量、产业数字化为中介变量,确定高素质人才、区域经济基础、城乡差距和政府支持为控制变量,以双重差分法对2013—2023年三者之间的关系进行计量分析。研究表明,第一,要素创新、产业数字化与区域协调发展在京津冀、长三角、珠三角、山东半岛、中原、长江中游和成渝等主要城市群已经达到较高发展水平,并以产业链为纽带在城市群之间形成产业分工。第二,科技创新引领新质生产力发展,但以传统生产要素为主的业态具有较高比重。第三,高素质人才供给与产业数字化需求存在结构性失衡问题,对二产数字化制约尤为严重。第四,政府支持与要素创新推动产业数字化促进区域协调发展中的匹配度有限,使有为政府引领有效市场建设的效果受到影响。第五,综合东西维度和南北维度,在现代化产业体系较为完善的华北、华中、华南和华东地区要素创新、产业数字化与区域协调发展的良性循环已经形成,其他地区相对滞后。基于此,文章提出相应对策,以有为政府引领有效市场,加强要素创新推动产业数字化促进区域协调发展;创新人力资本培育和发展机制,弥补践行创新驱动发展战略中的结构性人才缺口;科技创新覆盖现代化产业体系,全面发展新质生产力;充分利用数字经济和产业链能够细化产业分工的优势深化东、中、西、东北地区产业合作。

    Abstract:

    Regional coordinated development is a crucial aspect of China’s regional economics and an important manifestation of Chinese-style modernization. Industries serve as the primary vehicle for achieving this goal, and in the era of digital economy, industrial development must be guided by data and information. The Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China proposed improving the institutional mechanisms for deep integration between the real economy and the digital economy, as well as enhancing the strategic mechanisms for regional coordinated development. The 2024 Central Economic Work Conference explicitly called for actively applying digital and green technologies to transform and upgrade traditional industries, while enhancing the innovation capabilities and radiating effects of economically advantaged regions. Based on the reality that China’s four major regions are at different stages of development, this study uses the entropy method to conduct an empirical analysis of factor innovation, industrial digitization, and regional coordinated development levels across 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) from 2003 to 2023. Given that China’s digital economy entered a mature phase starting in 2013, factor innovation is taken as the explanatory variable, regional coordinated development level as the explained variable, and industrial digitization as the mediating variable. High-quality talents, regional economic foundations, urban-rural disparities, and government support are identified as control variables. A difference-in-differences approach is employed to analyze the relationships among these three factors from 2013 to 2023. The findings reveal that: 1) Factor innovation, industrial digitization, and regional coordinated development have reached relatively high levels in major urban agglomerations such as Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, Shandong Peninsula, Central Plains, the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, and Chengdu-Chongqing, with industrial chains serving as the link for inter-agglomeration industrial division. 2) Technological innovation drives the development of new quality productivity, but industries dominated by traditional production factors still account for a significant proportion. 3) There is a structural imbalance between the supply of high-quality talent and the demand for industrial digitization, particularly constraining the digitization of the secondary industry. 4) Government support exhibits mismatches in promoting industrial digitization through factor innovation to advance regional coordinated development, thereby affecting the effectiveness of a proactive government in guiding the construction of an efficient market. 5) Considering both the east-west and north-south dimensions, a virtuous cycle of factor innovation, industrial digitization, and regional coordinated development has formed in North China, Central China, South China, and East China, where modern industrial systems are relatively well-developed, while other regions lag behind. Based on these findings, this paper proposes corresponding countermeasures: leveraging a proactive government to guide an efficient market; solidifying the foundation for factor innovation to drive industrial digitization and promote regional coordinated development; innovating human capital cultivation and development mechanisms to address structural talent gaps in implementing innovation-driven strategies; expanding technological innovation to cover the modern industrial system to comprehensively develop new quality productivity; and fully utilizing the advantages of the digital economy and industrial chains to refine industrial division and deepen industrial cooperation across the eastern, central, western, and northeastern regions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王娟娟,徐萍桧.要素创新、产业数字化与区域协调发展——基于新质生产力视角的研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2025,31(5):1-17. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2025.03.003

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-05
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码