中国城市数字技术与文旅融合水平区域差异、来源分解及驱动力
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.桂林旅游学院 商学院,广西 桂林 541006;2.河南师范大学 公共政策与社会管理创新研究中心,河南 新乡 453007;3.广西职业师范学院 经济与贸易学院,广西 南宁 530007

作者简介:

杨莎莎,桂林旅游学院教授,博士研究生导师,Email:yss121@126.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F592;F49;G124

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代我国西部中心城市和城市群高质量协调发展战略研究”(20&ZD157)


Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanism of the integration of digital technology and culture-tourism in Chinese cities
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Business School, Guilin Tourism College, Guilin 541006, P.R.China;2.Innovation Research Center for Public Policy and Social Management, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, P.R.China;3.College of Economy and Trade, Guangxi Vocational Normal University, Nanning 530007, P.R.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在当前全球经济加速演进的背景下,数字技术凭借其强大的创新驱动能力与广泛的跨界应用,正日益成为引领经济转型升级的重要引擎。作为新质生产力的重要体现,数字技术不仅深刻变革了传统产业的运行逻辑,也为文化和旅游产业的结构重塑与业态创新提供了前所未有的机遇。数字技术与文旅产业的深度融合,推动了文旅消费模式的迭代与供给体系的优化,成为增强城市经济韧性与提升区域竞争力的重要路径之一。文章首先运用熵值法测度2011—2021年全国284个地级及以上城市的数字技术与文旅融合指数并探究其融合发展水平的时空分异格局;其次,从空间和结构双重视角,采用Dagum基尼系数和方差分解方法考察城市数字技术与文旅融合差异大小及来源;最后,运用地理探测器方法揭示数字技术与文旅融合驱动因素。结果表明:我国总体及四大区域数字技术与文旅融合发展水平整体上均呈现明显的上升态势,但四大区域间的数字技术与文旅融合发展空间分异特征明显,四大区域空间差异表现出“东部较高,中部次之,西部、东北较低”的分布格局;城市数字技术与文旅融合空间分异的原因主要来源于区域间差异,其中东部与中部区域间差异均值最大,而东北区域内差异均值高于东、中、西部地区;数字技术与文旅融合差异的主要结构来源于融合基础与融合规模;融合基础差异在中部区域贡献最高,融合规模差异贡献在东部、中部和东北部区域最高,融合效率差异在四大区域发展趋势较为平稳;数字技术与文旅融合发展的解释力强度依次为,数字技术创新>政府支持力度>经济发展水平>文化发展水平>交通基础设施>生态旅游环境,其中,数字技术创新与政府支持力度是数字技术与文旅融合发展的主导力量;数字技术与文旅融合发展水平受多因子复杂耦合作用,最佳交互因子为经济发展水平、政府支持力度和数字技术创新。研究丰富和拓展了城市数字技术与文旅融合体系的评价方案,为揭示我国城市数字技术与文旅融合差异演进状况、探寻空间与结构“双维”协同提升政策提供了重要的参考依据。

    Abstract:

    In the context of the current accelerated evolution of the global economy, digital technology is increasingly becoming an important engine leading economic transformation and upgrading with its strong innovation driven ability and wide range of cross-border applications. As an important embodiment of new quality productivity, digital technology has not only profoundly changed the operation logic of traditional industries, but also provided unprecedented opportunities for the restructuring and innovation of cultural and tourism industries. The deep integration of digital technology and culture and tourism industry has promoted the iteration of culture and tourism consumption mode and the optimization of supply system, and has become one of the important ways to enhance urban economic toughness and enhance regional competitiveness. This paper first uses the entropy method to measure the digital technology and cultural tourism integration index of 284 prefecture level and above cities in China from 2011 to 2021, and explores the spatial-temporal differentiation pattern of their integration development level. Secondly, based on the dual perspectives of space and structure, Dagum Gini coefficient and variance decomposition method are used to investigate the size and source of the difference between urban digital technology and cultural tourism integration. Finally, the driving factors of the integration are revealed by using the method of geographical detector. The results show that: 1) The overall development level of digital technology and cultural tourism integration in China and the four regions as a whole has shown an obvious upward trend, but the spatial differentiation characteristics of digital technology and cultural tourism integration development among the four regions are obvious, and the spatial differences among the four regions show a distribution pattern of higher in the east, second in the middle, and lower in the west and northeast; 2) The spatial differentiation of the integration of urban digital technology and culture and tourism is mainly due to regional differences. The average difference between the eastern and central regions is the largest, while the average difference in the northeast region is higher than that in the eastern, central and western regions; 3) The main structure of the difference between digital technology and cultural tourism integration comes from the integration basis and scale; The contribution of integration basis difference is the highest in the central region, the contribution of integration scale difference is the highest in the eastern, central and northeast regions, and the development trend of integration efficiency difference is relatively stable in the four regions; 4) The explanatory power of the integrated development of digital technology and culture and tourism is in the following order: digital technology innovation>government support>economic development level>cultural development level>transportation infrastructure>ecotourism environment. Among them, digital technology innovation and government support are the leading forces of the integrated development of digital technology and culture and tourism; The development level of integration of digital technology and culture and tourism is affected by complex coupling of multiple factors. The best interactive factors are the level of economic development, government support and digital technology innovation. This study enriches and expands the evaluation scheme of the integration system of urban digital technology and culture and tourism, and provides an important reference for revealing the differential evolution of the integration of urban digital technology and culture and tourism in China, and exploring the two-dimensional collaborative improvement policy of space and structure.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨莎莎,胡隆,卢玉桂.中国城市数字技术与文旅融合水平区域差异、来源分解及驱动力[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2025,31(5):32-47. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2025.09.003

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-05
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码