新形势下民营经济发展的经济法促进:误区澄清与进路展开
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

西南政法大学 经济法学院,重庆 401120

作者简介:

王怀勇,西南政法大学经济法学院教授,博士研究生导师,西南政法大学数字经济与法治研究中心主任,Email:swuplwhy@163.com
董磊(通信作者),西南政法大学经济法学院博士研究生,Email:swupldl@163.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D912.29

基金项目:

重庆市哲学社会科学规划重大项目“数据要素市场化配置法律问题研究”(2021TBWT-ZD12);重庆市研究生科研创新项目“何以谓之新?——数字经济时代新型垄断行为的证成标准”(CY25168)


On the economic law promotion of private economy development under the new situation: Clarification of misconceptions and development of pathways
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Economic Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, P.R.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着《民营经济促进法》的出台,民营经济发展法治促进的形势发生了较大变化。《民营经济促进法》成为民营经济领域基本法,民营经济法律规范群的格局得以重塑;法治进路由立法促进向执法促进、司法促进拓展,理论焦点由立法论向解释论转型,民营经济法治工作的重心得以调整;经济法角色由“重要参与者”向“核心推动者”过渡,民营经济愈发有赖于经济法促进。在此新形势下,阐明促进民营经济发展的经济法进路正当其时。然而,学界对经济法促进的理解还存在误区和模糊地带。主要涉及三个层面:一是规范层面,将新形势下民营经济发展的经济法促进简化为《民营经济促进法》的实施;二是功能层面,否认或者放弃《民营经济促进法》的“扶弱”功能;三是制度层面,淡化《民营经济促进法》解决民营经济特殊问题而非共性问题的制度倾向。实际上,新形势下经济法促进围绕《民营经济促进法》的实施而展开,不限于《民营经济促进法》的实施,若将经济法促进简化为《民营经济促进法》的实施,便陷入了“以偏概全”的认知误区,有“将复杂问题简单化”之嫌;“纠偏”与“扶弱”均是《民营经济促进法》的核心功能,不可偏废,若否定或者放弃“扶弱”功能,便人为“阉割”了《民营经济促进法》的促进功能,有“被功能定位绑住了手脚”之虞;《民营经济促进法》具有鲜明的解决特殊问题的倾向,这与其作为领域基本法的定位并不冲突,若淡化其解决特殊问题的制度倾向,便违背了以问题导向式立法为基础的领域法学的特殊旨趣,有“自我否定存在价值”之忧。为此,今后应当以持续推进《民营经济促进法》的实施及其配套法规的出台为中心,坚持“以促进型经济法为主、以限禁型经济法为辅”的规范布局,沿着“纠偏”与“扶弱”并进的功能进路,聚焦完善民营经济针对性促进制度的制度安排,构建从规范到功能再到制度的多维度经济法进路,加强新形势下民营经济发展的经济法促进,进而助推民营经济实现高质量发展。

    Abstract:

    With the enactment of the Private Economy Promotion Law, the situation for the promotion of the rule of law of the private economy has undergone significant changes. The Private Economy Promotion Law has become the foundational legislation in the private economy sector, reshaping the framework of private economic legal regulations The promotion of the rule of law has evolved from legislative advocacy to enforcement and judicial facilitation, shifting theoretical focus from legislative theory to interpretive theory, thereby realigning priorities in the rule of law of the private economy. The role of economic law has transitioned from key participant to core driver, as the private economy increasingly relies on its facilitative function. Under this new situation, clarifying the economic law approach to promoting the private economy is timely. However, academic discourse still harbors misconceptions or ambiguities regarding economic law’s promotional role. These misconceptions primarily involve three aspects: Firstly, at the normative level, the economic law promotion of private economy development under the new situation is simplified into the implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law; Secondly, at the functional level, there is a tendency to deny or abandon the support-for-the-weak function of the Private Economy Promotion Law; Thirdly, at the institutional level, there is a tendency to downplay the institutional tendency of the Private Economy Promotion Law to solve special problems of the private economy rather than common problems at the institutional level. In reality, while economic law’s promotion revolves around the implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law, it extends beyond mere enforcement. Reducing economic law’s promotional role to the implementation of this law would fall into the cognitive trap of hasty generalization, appearing to oversimplify complex issues. Both correction and support are core functions of the Private Economy Promotion Law, neither of which should be neglected. Denying or abandoning the supportive function would artificially castrate the law’s promotional role, risking functional constraints. The Private Economy Promotion Law has a distinct tendency to address specific issues, which aligns with its status as a fundamental law in this domain. Undermining this issue-specific institutional orientation would contradict the problem-oriented legislative approach foundational to domain-specific jurisprudence, raising concerns about self-negation of value. Therefore, future efforts should center on advancing the implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law and its supporting regulations, adhering to a normative framework that prioritizes promotive economic law while complementing it with restrictive economic law. Following a functional approach that advances both correction and support, we must focus on refining targeted promotional systems for the private economy. This involves constructing a multi-dimensional economic law pathway—from norms to functions to institutions—strengthening the promotion of the private economy under new conditions, and thereby fostering high-quality development in the private sector.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王怀勇,董磊.新形势下民营经济发展的经济法促进:误区澄清与进路展开[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2026,32(1):197-210. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2026.01.001

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码