文化—制度—行为:农民主体参与乡村建设研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.四川美术学院,重庆 401331;2.重庆壹秋堂文化传播有限公司,重庆 400020

作者简介:

皮永生,博士,四川美术学院教授,博士研究生导师
王艺雄(通信作者),四川美术学院硕士研究生,Email:454013415@qq.com
綦涛,重庆壹秋堂文化传播有限公司董事长,重庆市文化和旅游发展研究会副会长。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G249.2;F323

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金艺术学项目“新质生产力建构中的‘文化产业驱动和美乡村’设计理论及实践研究”(24BG127 );教育部社会科学研究青年项目“乡村振兴视域下设计赋能南疆非遗手工艺活化策略研究”(22XJJC760001);重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究规划项目“基于习近平文化思想的乡村文化设计研究”(24SKGH200)


Culture-system-behavior: Research on the participation of farmers in rural construction
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Sichuan Fine Arts Institute, Chongqing 401331, P.R.China;2.Chongqing Yiqiutang Culture Communication Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400020, P.R.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    乡村振兴是实现共同富裕的必由之路,促进农民主体参与乡村建设,充分激发农民主体性,对推进乡村振兴战略实施、实现人民美好生活需要具有重要意义。党的二十届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革、推进中国式现代化的决定》明确提出,要充分发挥农民主体作用和首创精神,2025年中央一号文件亦强调“坚持政府主导、农民主体、社会参与”,为农民主体性参与乡村建设提供了明确政策导向。在马克思主义人的需要理论和人本主义潜能观的融合视角下,农民主体参与乡村建设是实现人民美好生活需要的根本遵循。现有研究在乡村文化、乡村制度以及农民行为等三个方面取得了丰硕成果,通过进一步分析可以发现,文化、制度及行为分别从价值、组织、实践等三个层面影响着乡村建设中农民主体性的发挥,且三者之间具有“文化驱动—制度基础—行为支撑”的内在逻辑。在“文化—制度—行为”的框架下再次观照当下乡村建设实践,发现在乡村全面振兴背景下存在的地文化认同缺失、乡村制度结构冲突、农民行为发展受限等问题仍构成了农民主体参与乡村建设的现实困境。因此,文章在“文化—制度—行为”的框架下,从围绕“公共事件”增强文化认同意识、紧扣“创收需求”创造农民参与路径、推动“全岗参与”发展全面实践能力三个方面对广西Y非遗工坊建设实践进行了案例分析,认为在乡村建设实践中,需要以“共鸣”唤醒文化认同、以“共济”消解制度冲突、以“共通”打破能力屏障,进而激发农民主体性,促进农民主体参与乡村建设。而对于“谁的乡村建设”这一问题需要多维度、多视角的系统审视,乡村文化建设、制度建设以及行为建设是影响农民主体参与乡村建设的共有因素,对三者的综合考量能够有效带动农民主体参与乡村建设,促进农民主体性的发挥,助力农民在乡村振兴战略中实现共同富裕。

    Abstract:

    Rural revitalization is an essential pathway to achieving common prosperity. Promoting farmers’ active participation in rural construction and fully enhancing their agency play a critical role in advancing the rural revitalization strategy and fulfilling people’s aspirations for a better life. The Decision of the Third Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee calls for giving full play to farmers’ agency, creativity, and initiative, while the 2025 No.1 Central Document emphasizes government leadership, farmers’ participation, and social engagement, providing clear policy guidance for strengthening farmers’ agency in rural construction. From an integrated perspective that combines Marxist theory of human needs with the humanistic potential approach, farmers’ participation in rural construction is a fundamental path to realizing people’s pursuit of a better life. Existing research has produced significant achievements in three key areas: rural culture, rural institutions, and farmers’ behaviors. Further analysis reveals that these areas influence the development of farmers’ agency through three levels: value, organization, and practice, forming an intrinsic logic of cultural drive-institutional foundation-behavioral support. A re-examination of current rural construction practices through this culture-institution-behavior framework indicates that under the overarching strategy of comprehensive rural revitalization, challenges such as diminished local cultural identity, institutional conflicts, and limitations in farmers’ behavioral development continue to hinder farmers’ active participation. This study applies the culture-institution-behavior framework to a case analysis of the Y Intangible Cultural Heritage Workshop in Guangxi, focusing on three dimensions: enhancing cultural identity through public events, creating participation pathways based on income-generating needs, and fostering comprehensive practical capacities through multi-role participation. It argues that effective rural construction practice should resonate to awaken cultural identity, coordinate to resolve institutional conflicts, and connect to overcome capability barriers, thereby stimulating farmers’ agency and promoting their active participation in rural construction. Moreover, the question of whose rural construction demands a multi-dimensional and multi-perspective analysis. A comprehensive consideration of cultural development, institutional reform, and behavioral empowerment can effectively foster farmers’ active participation, strengthen their agency, and contribute to achieving common prosperity through the rural revitalization strategy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

皮永生,王艺雄,綦涛.文化—制度—行为:农民主体参与乡村建设研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2026,32(1):296-312. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. zs.2024.04.004

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码