民事诉讼标的三大理论述评
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A Comment on the Three Doctrines of Object of Civil Act
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    诉讼标的理论作为民事诉讼法学的基础理论,贯穿于民事诉讼的整个进程,它决定了法院和双方当事人诉讼活动的对象、诉讼标的的单复数、诉的变更与合并以及既判力的遮断范围。大陆法系的各国学者围绕诉讼标的这一概念进行了旷日持久的争论与研究,主要分为:旧实体法学说、诉讼法学说和新实体法学说。这三个学说各有利弊,至今在各大陆法系国家中没有达成一致认为。

    Abstract:

    As a fundamental theory of civil procedure law, the doctrine of object of civil action is penetrating the whole civil proceeding It has determined the target of a lawsuit between courts and litigants, the singular or plurality of the object of civil action, the change and consolidation of actions, and the scope of the fixed validity of judgement A protracted controversy and study about the conception of “object of action” has been arisen among the civil law scholars of different countries The study of object of civil action can be divided into three related stages, which are the stage of traditional substantive law theory, the stage of procedural law theory, and the stage of new substantive law theory But each of the theories has its own advantages and disadvantages respectively, they are being ceaselessly consummated in the progress Regretfully, till now, there has not yet a consistent perspective in the civil law countries

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王斌,李龙,李婵.民事诉讼标的三大理论述评[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2008,14(2):100-104.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: