论中国反垄断法对行业协会的规制
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The Regulation to Industrial Association In China’s “Antimonopoly Law”
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于行业协会行为限制竞争的可能性,各国反垄断法纷纷通过“补充标准”或“术语解释”的方式将其纳入规制范围,并采用了“实质高于形式”的规制原则。具体措施上,除了设定行业协会职能的法律界限,限制行业协会处罚权的行使之外,各国反垄断法还从实体与程序两个方面规定了行业协会的活动规则。中国《反垄断法》对行业协会的规制,一定程度上克服了《价格法》规制行业协会限制竞争行为的不足,但所确立的实体制度与程序制度仍相对简单,法律责任设置也存在缺漏或可操作性障碍。

    Abstract:

    As the industrial association’s conduct has the possibility of restricting competition, the antimonopoly law in most countries is inclined to regulate such conducts by the way of “additional standard” or “interpretation of the term”, and take the principle of “essence is more important than outward form”. As to the concrete measures, in addition to setting the legal limits to the industrial association’s function, restricting the exercise of the right to punish the member enterprises, most countries’ antimonopoly law stipulate the industrial association’s conduct rules from both the substantive and procedural aspects. The provisions in China’s “Antimonopoly Law”, to some extent, overcome the shortcomings in China’s “Price Law”, but the correlative system is still relatively simple, and the legal liability is also insufficient.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

盛杰民,焦海涛.论中国反垄断法对行业协会的规制[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2008,14(4):93-98.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: