论信息哲学对科研成果评价的方法论意义
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The Methodology Significance of Information Philosophy on Evaluation for Scientific Research Performance
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    科研成果的定量评价方法与定性评价方法是目前国内外通行的两大科研评价方法。论文认为,信息哲学从信息中介与信息构建的角度分别为定量评价方法与定性评价方法提供了理论支持,对科研成果评价具有方法论意义。通过论述信息中介说对间接指标评价方法的指导,提出定量与定性相结合的科研成果综合评价方法论;深入分析信息构建说与主观定性评价方法之间的关系,认为追求主观定性评价的客观性,实际上指的是评价主体间的一致性,并提出基于信息构建来解决主观评价方法合理性问题的假设前提。

    Abstract:

    Qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation are two common ways of scientific evaluation research use both at home and abroad recently. We think that information philosophy provides theoretical support to qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation from the aspects of information intermediaries and information construction, and it is significant to scientific evaluation research method. Through discussion about the guide of information intermediary on indirect index evaluation, methodology of comprehensive scientific research evaluation that combines qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation is pointed out; on analysis of the relationship between information construction and subjective qualitative evaluation method, this paper thinks that we seek objectivity of subjective qualitative evaluation, which actually means the consistency among subjects, then hypothesis on how to use information construction to solve the reasonableness of subjective qualitative evaluation is brought up.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

任全娥.论信息哲学对科研成果评价的方法论意义[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2009,15(1):58-61.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: