人文社会科学评价的多元化和国际化标准
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The Plural and International Standard for the Evaluation of Humanities and Social Sciences
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    当代中国经济的飞速发展,使得中国在国际社会的政治大国和经济大国地位得以确立。越来越多的外国人,尤其是西方国家的知识分子,开始对中国文化发生兴趣。但是,中国的人文社会科学工作者在国际上的声音依然十分微弱,以致于有人竟认为中国学者患了“失语症”。作者虽然不同意这种看法,但也不得不承认这样一个事实,即在公认的国际人文社会科学权威学术刊物上很少见到中国学者的论文。尽管其中的意识形态和语言文化霸权的因素不可排除,但中国学者的主观努力也远远不够。这就需要我们认识到人文社会科学研究的国际化的重要性和紧迫性。作者根据多年来在国际学术刊物上发表论文的经验,提出一种多元评价标准,即除了重视在SSCI和A&HCI来源期刊上发表论文外,人文学科的学者还应当在国际著名的出版社出版专著或编著。追求在SSCI和A&HCI来源期刊上发文数量的同时,更应该注重文章的被引用率和实际影响力。总之,在作者看来,实行中国人文社会科学研究的国际化战略要从三个方面来共同努力:(1)组织学术造诣深厚且英文写作好的学者集体攻关,力争在公认的国际权威刊物上发表数量可观的原创性论文,并使有分量的学术专著在国际权威出版社出版;(2)培养一支高水平的学术翻译队伍,通过与国外学者的合作,将中国人文社会科学的优秀成果译成英文,在国际学术刊物上发表或在国际权威出版社出版;(3)努力打造中国人文社会科学的精品刊物和精品出版社,绝不以盈利为目的,争取在今后五年内,向汤姆森科技信息集团推荐100种SSCI或A&HCI来源期刊。

    Abstract:

    The rapid development of contemporary Chinese economy has enabled China to function as a political and economic power in the world. More and more foreigners, especially intellectuals in the West, have become interested in Chinese culture. But unfortunately, the voices of Chinese scholars of humanities and social sciences are so weak on international forum that they are thought to suffer from “aphasia”. Although the author does not agree with this idea, he cannot but recognize the fact that it is no easy to find Chinese scholars’ articles published in international authoritative journals of humanities and social sciences. It is true that the factors of ideology and linguistic and cultural hegemony should be taken into consideration, but we Chinese scholars have not made enough efforts in this aspect. It is certainly demanding to realize the importance of the internationalization of China’s humanities and social sciences. To the author, it is necessary to adopt a plural standard to evaluate the research in humanities and social sciences, that is, apart from articles listed in SSCI and A&HCI, monographs or edited volumes published by international prestigious presses should also be taken into account. It is not the number of published journal articles but their factual impact that should be more evaluated. At the moment, it is necessary to make the following three efforts to realize the internationalization of China’s humanities and social sciences: (1) To organize excellent scholars to write excellent works to publish in some international prestigious journals and presses; (2) To train a group of high-leveled academic translators so as to translate the best humanities and social sciences works by Chinese scholars into English so that they could be published internationally; (3) To create a number of journals and presses of good international reputation and recommend as many as 100 humanities and social sciences journals to be listed in SSCI or A&HCI.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王宁.人文社会科学评价的多元化和国际化标准[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2009,15(4):83-89.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-05-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: