先秦传世文献“情”考辨
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社科基金西部项目(08XZW010);湖北省教育厅2008年度人文社会科学研究重点项目(2008d082)


Discriminating “Qing” in the Literatures among the PreQin Dynasty
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对于先秦传世文献中的“情”,李天虹和欧阳祯人都曾作过细致论述,既有其合理内核,也有其明显不足。从先秦“性”“情”说的大背景中考察,“情”在先秦传世文献中应具有两种含义:一种与“性”相对,具有形上意味,指人或物的自然本性;一种有形下意味,又可分为两类:(1)主观的,指内心之实;(2)客观的,指事物之实。

    Abstract:

    The discussion about Qing in the literatures among the PreQin Dynasty by Li tianhong and Ouyang zhenren had both rationality and shortage.There were two kinds of meanings about Qing in the literatures among the PreQin Dynasty in the background of theory of Nature and Qing. One was metaphysical comparatively with Nature meaning nature itself of human or thing and the other was not metaphysical which had two kinds of meanings. One was subjective meaning true in heart and the other was objective meaning true in business.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张金梅.先秦传世文献“情”考辨[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2010,16(4):124-128.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-03-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: