从西方艺术史研究模式看丹托“艺术终结”的悖论
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

南京理工大学科技发展基金项目“威胁戏剧的美学研究”(XKF09053)


On Danto’s Paradox of the End of Art From Perspective of the Research Models of the Western Art History
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    生物学模式、进化论模式、形式主义模式是对西方艺术史研究的主要理论模式。这三种模式的嬗变形成不同历史时期对艺术与非艺术的评判体系,其体系内部发展的逻辑动力促进了艺术的终结。文章通过梳理传统艺术理论模式的构造,分析其历史意识与艺术本质的关系,说明由于传统模式中艺术边界的设定,使艺术史概念的外延狭窄化,导致了“终结论”的产生。同时,针对丹托的“终结论”话语系统,分析“后历史”叙事的矛盾性,揭示出:艺术史边界的扩张仍然不能把握艺术的本质,相反,艺术在新的概念中迷失了方向,超越了历史的边界,成为不可言说的“观念”。

    Abstract:

    Biological model, evolutionary model and formalistic model are the main theoretical research models in the study of the western art history The evolution of the three models forms the art and nonart criterion in different historical periods And the logical dynamic of the internal development in the system promotes the end of art This article analyzes the relationship between historical consciousness and artistic essence through reviewing the structure of the traditional models of artistic theory, to explain that the theory of “the end of art” comes from the narrow concept extension of art history, due to the setting of art boundary in traditional models Meanwhile, this article also analyzes the contradiction of the posthistory narrative in terms of the Danto’s discourse system in The End of Art, and reveals that the expansion of the boundary of art history is still unable to grasp the artistic essence On the contrary, lost in the new concept, art exceeds the historical boundary, and becomes a “concept” that is beyond expression Consequently, “postart history” falls into a predicament of ineffective writing

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

袁小华,李亚琴.从西方艺术史研究模式看丹托“艺术终结”的悖论[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2010,16(5):135-140.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-07
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: