以交通肇事罪为视角解读共犯理论
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务基金“论犯罪构成的结构与功能”


Explanation for the Accomplice in the Perspective of Traffic Accident Crimes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的情形中,指使人和肇事者的主观罪过既存在有故意也存在有过失。在四种情行中两者都可能构成共犯。根据最高人民法院的解释指使人以交通肇事罪的共犯论,且在刑法理论上一般认为交通肇事罪的主观罪过是过失。而传统的共犯理论认为共犯是故意犯罪。由此,理论界和最高人民法院的解释之间无疑产生分歧。运用“行为理论”或许能更好地解读共犯的主观罪过。

    Abstract:

    There are both intention and negligence in terms of mens rea of his instigators and a perpetrator who causing a traffic accident and his escape results in the victim’s death. They may constitute an accomplice under four conditions. According to interpretations of the Supreme Court, the instigators shall be joint offenders. However, generally, the mens rea of the perpetrator is negligence in traffic accident crime. What’s more, the traditional theory about the accomplice maintains that the mens rea of the offender is usually intention. Therefore, there is undoubtedly a difference between the theory and interpretation of Supreme Court. The use of behavior theory may help preferably understand mens rea of joint crime.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谢海燕.以交通肇事罪为视角解读共犯理论[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2013,19(3):112-116. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2013.03.018

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-05-17
  • 出版日期: