文化传媒与司法关系的三种调控模式——以两大法系国家为视角的分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

重庆大学中央高校自主科研重点项目“司法与传媒良性互动机制研究”(CDJSK11013)


Three Regulatory Modes of the Relation Between Justice and Media: Analysis of the Two Legal Systems
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    两大法系国家对传媒与司法关系的调控分为三种模式。英美法系的两种调控模式使得传媒与司法关系问题变得清晰,但仍存在不足因而需要加以改良。大陆法系调控模式更为关注维护当事人个人隐私及人格尊严,同时亦关注无罪推定原则不受传媒的影响。对于传媒的涉法院言论,大陆法系国家采取了包括事先限制、私法救济等一系列限制措施,以减少对司法程序造成的不良影响。两大法系国家对于传媒与司法关系的调控差异正逐渐缩小,各国法律相互融合的态势正在发生。

    Abstract:

    The regulatory mode of the relation between justice and media in the two legal systems is divided into three modes. The two regulatory modes of the common law make the relation between justice and media clear, but there are still shortcomings which need to be improved. The regulatory mode of civil law is more concerned to preserve the parties’ personal privacy and human dignity, while also concerned about the presumption of innocence from the influence of the media. For the media’s court-related statements, the civil law countries take prior restrictions, private relief and a series of restrictive measures in order to reduce the adverse impact on the judicial process. The two legal systems’ difference of regulation on the relation between the justice and the media is gradually reduced, the merging of national legal trend is taking place.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谢锦添,吴如巧.文化传媒与司法关系的三种调控模式——以两大法系国家为视角的分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2013,19(3):117-124. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2013.03.019

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-05-17
  • 出版日期: