公共管理价值取向的重新审视
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国海洋发展研究中心重点项目(AOCZD20130)


Re-examination to the Value Orientation of Public Management
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    公共管理的价值取向不仅关系到公共管理者的理想、信念、行政态度等意识层面的内容,而且还直接影响其行为模式、政策选择和制度建构。百余年的公共管理学史也是对公共管理基本价值取向的研究史,特别是公平与效率的探讨一直是公共管理研究的重要内容。无论从公共管理的本质特性——“公共性”的视角,还是从关注领域和历史使命上看,它完全不同于威尔逊提出的行政学,公共管理理论必须重新溯源,行政学所推崇的效率价值也有必要重新审视。另外,公共管理追求的效率引自经济学、管理学中效率的术语外壳,但无论是“社会福利最大化”还是“帕累托最优”都有其内在缺陷,它的可移植性令人质疑。

    Abstract:

    Public management’s value orientation not only relates to the consciousness level, such as ideals, beliefs, and administrative attitudes of public managers, but also has a direct impact on their behavior patterns, policy options and institutional construction. The history of a hundred years’ public management is also the research history of the public management basic value mindset, especially the study of equity and efficiency has been the main point of public management research, but there is a disagreement between the researchers about the relationship of above two ones. From the view of essential characteristics of public management—“Public”, it is totally different from the administration what Thomas Woodrow Wilson puts forward. Therefore, the public management theory has to re-trace to origins, the efficiency value worshiped by the public management also has a necessity to re-examine. In addition, public management’s chasing for efficiency comes from the external item of economics and management. But no matter “The maximization of social welfare” or “Pareto Optimality”, both of them have their intrinsic defects. So its transferability is questioned.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王印红.公共管理价值取向的重新审视[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2014,20(4):93-99. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2014.04.012

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-07-01
  • 出版日期: