论环境侵害的共同但有区别的责任原则
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Study on the Common but Differentiated Responsibility Principle of Environment Infringement
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    环境侵害概念走出了人类中心主义藩篱,容纳了人类环境行为造成的所有环境污染和生态破坏内涵。基于现行环境侵权的责任归责原则主要救济的是环境污染和生态破坏中被侵犯的人身权和财产权,而更多针对环境和生态自身的侵权不能获得救济。所以它不能担负起环境侵害的全面救济责任。针对环境侵害的原因行为和被侵害权益的不同性质,借鉴和运用国际环境法中的共同但有区别的责任原则理念进行责任归责,并设置具体责任机制,可以摒弃现行环境侵权归责原则的片面性,实现环境侵害责任的全面、合理、公平分担,实现生态正义。

    Abstract:

    The concept of environment infringement breaks through the anthropocentrism barriers and contains all the connotations of environmental pollution and ecological destruction which are caused by human environmental behaviors. Relief of the imputation principle of present environment tort mainly aims at the personal right and property right tort caused by environmental pollution and ecological destruction, but more torts towards environment and ecology can not get relief. Therefore it can’t assume the full relief responsibility for environmental infringement. According to causal behaviors of environment infringement and different natures of the Infringed rights, to learn and use the idea of common but differentiated responsibility principle in international environmental law to attribute the liabilities and set up specific responsibility attribution mechanisms, will help to get rid of one-sidedness of present imputation principle of environment tort. And it is very meaningful to realize the comprehensive, reasonable and equitable sharing and to realize ecological justice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙玉中,陈德敏.论环境侵害的共同但有区别的责任原则[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2014,20(4):135-140. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2014.04.019

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-07-01
  • 出版日期: