Chinese existing social sciences academic journals evaluation system basically uses the quantitative evaluation. Although there is some rationality, it will bring problems and disadvantages gradually. Most importantly, it fails to better guide the academic journal to play its due role in promoting academic innovation or leading the academic atmosphere. The basic ideas of constructing Chinese social sciences academic journals evaluation system should combine the qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation, which leaded by peer review; transfer from “comment articles based on journals” to “comment journals based on articles”, advocate and implement representative council system; establish a multi-dimensional index comprehensive evaluation system that “ highlight the focus, consider the general”. The article suggests to build a multi-level evaluation system from four aspects, which are academic innovation, academic influence, running ability and study style construciton.