论人大监督司法的类型化及其发展方向
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The categorization of judicial supervision of the People’s Congress and its developing direction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    全面深化司法改革的核心是还权于司法者,其必然导致司法权力运行主体更加分散化、内部行政监督更加弱化。在此新形势下,加强和完善各级人大及其常委会的司法监督正当其时。人大监督司法是对行使审判权和检察权的主体即法院和检察院的监督,其根本内容不是监督司法行为或司法活动,而是监督司法权。监督司法工作的具体内容应当类型化为法律监督、工作监督和人事监督三个方面,并且实现法律监督的深入化、工作监督的常态化和人事监督的实质化,才能有效提升各级人大及其常委会的监督质效,确保宪法赋予的监督权得到正确、有力的实施。

    Abstract:

    The core spirit of the deepening of judicial reform comprehensively is to return the original power to the judges and prosecutors. Therefore, the judicial power operating subject will be more decentralized, and the inner supervision will be more weaken. In this situation, it is the right time to strengthen and improve the judicial supervision of all levels of People’s Congress and its standing committee. The judicial supervision of the People’s Congress is to supervise the people’s courts and procuratorates. The principal contents of the supervision is to supervise the power of judicial power, not the judicial acts. The judicial supervision should be typed as legal-supervision, work-supervision and personnel-supervision. In order to effectively improve the supervision quality and efficiency of the people’s congresses at all levels and the Standing Committee, to ensure the constitutional power be implemented correctly and completely, the legal-supervision should be deepen, the work-supervision should be normalized, and the personnel supervision should be substantialized.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨炎辉.论人大监督司法的类型化及其发展方向[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2015,21(5):146-151. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2015.05.020

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-14
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-10-10
  • 出版日期: