教育质量:三类概念模型的探析与启示
作者:

Education quality: Analysis and inspirations of three types of conceptual models
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [11]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章通过对"以学习者为中心"、"投入-过程-产出"以及"多维度社会交互"这三类教育质量概念模型的探析,形成了关于教育质量研究的进一步认识:从研究对象的角度看,教育质量除了复杂与多维外,还具有动态的特征;从研究趋势的角度看,概念模型将成为未来教育质量概念研究的新着力点;从教育实践的角度看,提高教育质量要充分发挥利益相关者的作用。

    Abstract:

    Through analysis of three types of conceptual models which are "learner-centered", "inputs-process-outputs" and "multidimensional social interaction", the further understanding about education quality research is that: education quality has dynamic characteristics in addition to complex and many dimensions in the view of research object; the conceptual model approach may or will become a new focal point of future concept study in education quality from the perspective of the research trend; and from the educational practice angle of vision, it is important to improve education quality by giving full play to the role of stakeholders.

    参考文献
    [1] 林永柏.关于高等教育质量概念的界定[J].教育科学,2007,23(6):32-36.
    [2] 教育大辞典编篡委员会.教育大辞典(第一卷)[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1990:24.
    [3] 朱益明.教育质量的概念分析[J].比较教育研究,1996(5):55-58.
    [4] 秦玉友.教育质量的概念取向与分析框架——联合国相关组织的研究与启示[J].外国教育研究,2008, 35(3):102-106.
    [5] UNESCO.EFA End-of-Decade Notes for All, Goal 6. Bangkok: EFA Technical Working Group for Asia Pacific Region[C].2011.
    [6] PIGOPZZI M.J. What is the Quality of Education? in Ross & Jurgens Genevois (Eds.) Crossing-national studies of quality of education: Planning their design and managing their impact[M].Paris: International Institute of Educational Planning,2006:39-50.
    [7] UNESCO.EFA Global Monitoring Report 2002: Is the world on track[M]. Paris: UNESCO,2002.
    [8] UNESCO.EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005: The quality imperative[M]. Paris: UNESCO,2005.
    [9] NIKLE, J.& J. LLWE. "Talking of frabic: a multi-dimensional model of quality in Education[J]. Compare:A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 201040(5):589-605.
    [10] 周宪,许钧.自反性现代性——现代社会秩序中政治、传统和美学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004:145.
    [11] TIKLY, L.& A.M. BARRETT. Education Quality: Research priorities and approaches in the globe era[J]. Bristol: University of Bristol,2007.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

邱均平,艾杨.教育质量:三类概念模型的探析与启示[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(1):133-138. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2016.01.016

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1112
  • 下载次数: 1018
  • HTML阅读次数: 1142
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-02-24
文章二维码