律师庭外言论的规制——兼论《刑法修正案(九)》泄露案件信息罪
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(CDJSK-11046)


Regulation of lawyers' extrajudicial statements: Also on crime of leaking case information in Criminal Law Amendment (Ⅸ)
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    发表庭外言论是律师采取的一种诉讼策略,意在通过塑造公众舆论影响庭内裁判结果。《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》将律师庭外不当言论入刑不仅在刑法哲学上有违谦抑性要求,在法律文本上也存在不符合罪刑法定原则等问题。为维护法律的权威性,中国对律师庭外言论的规制,一方面应通过法律解释、“但书条款”和管辖回避构建防止滥用泄露案件信息罪的三道防线;另一方面应借鉴美国律师协会对律师庭外言论采取的限制与保护并举的规制措施,在保障律师言论自由的基础上,对发表造成严重后果和恶劣影响言论的律师施以资格罚。

    Abstract:

    Publishing extrajudicial statements is a litigation strategy adopted by lawyers to shape public opinion then affect trial results. Penalty of lawyers' inappropriate statements in Criminal Law Amendment (Ⅸ) violates the modest restraint of criminal law, and does not comply with the principle of legality. To safeguard the authority of law, a defense system composed of legal interpretation, "notwithstanding clause" and jurisdiction avoidance should be constructed to regulate lawyers' extrajudicial statements. Also, American Bar Association's restriction and protection measures should be learned to protect lawyers' freedom of expression and meanwhile impose qualification penalty on lawyers whose inappropriate statements cause serious consequences and adverse effects.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马晶,杨天红.律师庭外言论的规制——兼论《刑法修正案(九)》泄露案件信息罪[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(4):167-173. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2016.04.020

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-07-18
  • 出版日期: