学术期刊评奖是学术期刊评价的重要形式。在中国学术期刊评奖中，高校较为正规、典型，值得研究。始于20世纪90年代的高校学术期刊评奖，对学术期刊办刊水平的提升产生了积极的推动作用，但在评奖的质量标准与制度设计上基本沿用了1996年新闻出版署颁发的《社科期刊质量标准及评估办法》，尚存在不少问题，需要进一步完善。首先，为突出学术期刊的特点，拟将原质量标准中的“业务标准”改为“学术标准”，其评价指标包括期刊被引率、论文摘转率、论文获奖率以及写作质量和尊重知识产权5项。其次，应将编辑标准与出版标准合并为编辑出版标准。再次，在原“业务标准”下之“社会影响”指标的基础上，增补期刊获奖、高影响力论文率、社会信誉度和读者认可度等项，增设期刊影响力标准。第四，为方便同行专家定性评价，增加同行专家定性评价参考指标。第五，为实现量化评价的科学、合理，宜重新调整、设计评分指标权重。目前，评奖的制度亦需完善，应坚持实行定量与定性相结合的评价方法，健全分类评估制度、完善评奖程序和专家评审、回避及监督制度。

Academic journal award is an important form of academic journal evaluation. Beginning in 1990s, the awards of university academic journals play a positive role in enhancing the level of academic journals. But there are still problems in quality standard of awards and the system design. Firstly, to highlight the characteristics of academic journals, the original "business standard" should be changed to "academic standard", and its evaluation indexes include citation rate, reprint rate, rate of papers be awarded and writing quality as well as respecting of intellectual property rights. Secondly, "editing standard" and "publishing standard" should be merged to "editing and publishing standard". Thirdly, it should add "journal Influence standard" by supplementing the original "social impact" indexes with journal awards, high impact papers rate, social credibility and readers' acceptance, etc. Fourthly, peer experts' qualitative evaluation indexes need to be added. Fifthly, it should adjust and re-design weight of evaluation indexes. The awards system also need to be improved by adhering to a quantitative and qualitative combined evaluation method, improving the classification evaluation system as well as the evaluation procedure and expert assessment, avoidance and supervision system. Perfection of quality standard and award system of university academic journals awards has reference value to various national academic journals awards.

教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目“以量化为基础以代表作为主的综合化学术评价制度构建”（13jdxf004）