中国上市银行的经营能力与风险能力提升研究——基于管理策略的非径向DEA方法
作者:
中图分类号:

F830.3

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目"空间经济学在中国的理论与实践研究"(13&ZD166);福建省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心一般项目"推动福建产业转型升级的创新机制与对策研究"(D10)


Research on improving operational performance and risk performance of Chinese listed banks:Non-radial DEA methodology based on corporate strategy
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [11]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究利用结合管理策略的自然可处置和管理可处置非径向DEA方法测度了中国16家上市银行2006-2012年期间的规模报酬(returns to scale,RTS)和规模损害(damages to scale,DTS)程度。测度结果表明:除平安银行、华夏银行和光大银行可通过扩大投入规模改善经营能力外,中信银行、浦发银行和所有国有上市银行应通过压缩投入规模或改善管理水平提高经营能力,改善目前管理水平是其他股份制上市银行提高经营能力的最佳策略;南京银行、北京银行、宁波银行和平安银行可在扩大投入规模经营时保持较高的风险能力,其他上市商业银行应通过减少投入或改善风险管理水平提高风险能力。总体而言,国有上市银行存在投入过度的情况,其过多的投入不仅抑制其提升经营能力,还阻碍其改进风险能力。

    Abstract:

    This study uses non-radial DEA methodology under natural and managerial disposability based on the corporate strategy to measure the degree of RTS (returns to scale) and DTS (damages to scale) of 16 listed banks in China during the period of 2006-2012.The measurement results show that PingAn bank, HuaXia bank and GuangDa bank can improve their operational performance through increasing inputs scale, ZhongXin bank, Pufa bank and state-owned banks can improve their operational performance through downsizing their inputs or improving their management level, and the improvement of management level is optimal strategy of other joint-stock listed banks which can be adopted to improve their operational performance. NanJing bank, BeiJing bank, NingBo bank and PingAn bank can increase their inputs while maintain relative higher risk performance, other listed banks can improve their risk performance by means of decreasing their inputs or improving their management level. On the whole, there exist excessive inputs which not only retard the improvement of operational performance but also suppress the amelioration of risk performance of state-owned listed banks in China.

    参考文献
    [1] ARIFF M,CAN L.Cost and efficiency of Chinese banks:A non-parametric analysis[J].China Economic Review,2008,19(2):260-273.
    [2] YAO S J,HAN Z W,FENG G F.Ownership reform,foreign competition,and efficiency of Chinese commercial banks:A non-parametric approach[J].The World Economy,2008,38(10):1310-1326.
    [3] 朱超.中国银行业效率动态变化的Malmquist指数研究:2000-2004[J].经济科学,2006(5):51-62.
    [4] 唐齐鸣,杨龙.基于内、外部风险考虑的商业银行X效率研究[J].金融学(季刊),2009(2):58-79.
    [5] 蔡跃洲,郭梅军.我国上市商业银行全要素生产率的实证分析[J].经济研究,2009(9):52-65.
    [6] 张建华,王鹏.银行效率及其影响因素研究——基于中、外银行业的跨国比较[J].金融研究,2011(5):13-28.
    [7] 李小胜,郑智荣.中国上市银行效率及其影响因素——基于两阶段SBM模型的实证研究[J].中国经济问题,2015(4):24-32.
    [8] SUEYOSHI T,GOTO M.A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment[J]. Energy Economics, 2013,40:130-145.
    [9] SUEYOSHI T,GOTO M.Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment:Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries[J].Energy Economics,2012,34(3):686-699.
    [10] SUEYOSHI T,GOTO M.DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability:Theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions[J]. Energy Economics,2012,34(3):700-713.
    [11] FARE R,GROSSKOP S.Slacks and congestion:A comment[J]. Social-Economic Planning Sciences,2000,34(1):27-33.
    [12] FERRIER G D, LOVELL C A K.Measuring cost efficiency in banking:Econometric and linear programing evidence[J].Journal of Econometrics,1990,46(1/2):229-245.
    [13] COOPER W W,PARK K S,CIURANA J T P.Marginal rates and elasticities of substitution with additive models in DEA[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis,2000,13(2):105-123.
    [14] 秦宛顺,欧阳俊.中国商业银行市场结构、效率和绩效[J].经济科学,2001(4):34-45.
    [15] 王付彪,阚超,沈谦,等.我国商业银行技术效率与技术进步实证研究(1998-2004)[J].金融研究,2006(8):122-132.
    引证文献
引用本文

邹滨,章贵军,梁琦.中国上市银行的经营能力与风险能力提升研究——基于管理策略的非径向DEA方法[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2017,23(6):60-70. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831.2017.06.007

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-12
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-11-02
文章二维码