社会科学总论学科域映射评价及其对“双一流”建设的启示研究——基于ESI工具视角
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C34

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目"基于引用内容的单篇论文评价指标体系研究"(71503030);大连理工大学学科建设项目"世界一流大学和一流学科评价与发展战略研究"(2018-019)


Evaluation of disciplinedomain mapping of social sciences and its enlightenment to “Double First-Class” construction: Based on ESI
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    学科域是具有相互联系、相互依赖、相互支撑的学科构成的学科体系,ESI社会科学总论学科域不仅涉及哲学人文社会科学,还涉及理学、工学以及医学门类等。借助Web of Science数据库提供的(WC字段)学科分类分别与我国教育部学科分类映射关系,对我国10所机构的社会科学总论的学科域进行学科映射分析。研究发现:第一,社会科学总论排名前五的支撑学科分别为:公共卫生与预防医学、计算机科学与技术、环境科学与工程、社会学和地理学;第二,综合性大学中"社会科学总论"学科域包含了较多的人文社科类学科,相反,在理工科大学中,"社会科学总论"学科域支撑学科以理、工、医学科为主;第三,交叉学科对社会科学总论支撑学科的发展发挥了重要的贡献作用。因此,"双一流"建设中,优化社会科学学科结构,打造学科高峰;促进文理交叉融合,实现学科互补发展;构建中国特色的社会科学评价体系和标准,对于推动我国高校"双一流"建设具有重要价值。

    Abstract:

    Discipline domain is a system consisting of interrelated, interdependent and mutually supportive disciplines. Social sciences involve not only humanities social science but also sciences, engineering, and medical sciences and so on. The research analyzes the 10 institutions' discipline domain of social sciences by discipline classification provided by Web of Science database and the Ministry of Education in China. It finds that, firstly, the top five supporting disciplines of the general theory of social sciences are public health and preventive medicine, computer science and technology, environmental science and engineering, sociology and geography; secondly, in comprehensive universities, the discipline field of "social science general theory" contains more humanities and social sciences disciplines, on the contrary, in science and engineering universities, the supporting disciplines of "social science general theory" discipline field are mainly science, engineering and medicine. Thirdly, cross-discipline plays an important role in the development of supporting disciplines of social science general theory. Therefore, it is of great value for the "Double First-Class" construction in Chinese universities to optimize the structure of social science disciplines and to create the peak of the disciplines, to promote the integration of arts and science and to realize the complementary development of disciplines, and to construct the evaluation system and standards of social science with Chinese characteristics.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘苗苗,姜华,刘盛博.社会科学总论学科域映射评价及其对“双一流”建设的启示研究——基于ESI工具视角[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2019,25(6):97-108. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2019.04.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-09-21
  • 出版日期: