美国智库参与国家意识形态治理的路径及其对中国特色新型智库建设的启示
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C932

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金西部项目"我国智库维护意识形态安全的功能及实现机制研究"(15XKS024);西南大学2018年度人文社科研究重大项目培育项目"新型智库嵌入国家意识形态治理体系的国际经验借鉴及路径选择";西南大学中央高校基本科研项目重点项目"新时代建设强大凝聚力和引领力的社会主义意识形态研究"及"习近平总书记关于意识形态工作重要讲话的理论梳理及实践遵循研究"


The path of American think tanks participating in national ideological governance and its enlightenment to the construction of new think tanks with Chinese characteristics
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    美国智库作为国家意识形态治理多端主体中的重要角色,从纵向历史来看,美国智库的意识形态化契合了国家治理的现实需求;从横向视角来看,智库深度参与政治体系运作、构建意识形态话语体系、促进意识形态大众传播、积极进行对外意识形态渗透、搭建思想共识平台,以及借由"旋转门"机制,积极"影响有影响力的人"等,在意识形态治理中扮演着愈益积极的角色。尽管制度属性有本质差别,但美国智库深度嵌入国家意识形态治理体系的举措,也为中国特色新型智库建设提供了有益的启示:以专业化为趋势,政府主导建设特色智库方阵;以职业化为标准,营建智库人才成长和流动机制;以多样化为布局,多管齐下扩展智库的影响力;以专题化为突破,集中攻坚意识形态治理瓶颈。

    Abstract:

    American think tanks play an important role in the multiple subjects of national ideology governance.From the perspective of vertical history, the ideology of American think tanks meets the realistic needs of state governance.From a horizontal perspective, think tanks are deeply involved in the operation of the political system, constructing an ideological discourse system, promoting ideological mass communication, actively infiltrating foreign ideologies, building a consensus platform for ideas, and actively "affecting influential people" through the "revolving door" mechanism, so American think tanks play an increasingly active role in the governance of ideology.Despite the essential differences in institutional attributes, the deeply embedding of American think tanks into the national ideological governance system has also provided useful enlightenment for the construction of new types of think tanks with Chinese characteristics:the government should lead the construction of characteristic think tanks with the trend of specialization; the talent growth and motivation mechanism of think tanks should be established with the criterion of professionalization; the influences of think tanks should be expanded in a multi-pronged manner with the layout of diversification; the ideological governance bottlenecks should be concentrated on tackling with the breakthroughs of thematization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴艳东,吴兴德.美国智库参与国家意识形态治理的路径及其对中国特色新型智库建设的启示[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(2):96-107. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2019.10.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2019-06-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-03-14
  • 出版日期: