长三角一体化发展的边界效应研究——基于城际消费流视角
作者:
中图分类号:

F713.56;F727;F127

基金项目:

教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"基于消费流视角的城市群多中心到一体化的影响因素与发展策略研究"(20YJAZH133);国家社会科学基金重点项目"新时代长三角城市群高质量发展战略研究"(19AZD006);第四次全国经济普查公开招标立项课题"长江三角洲区域一体化发展研究"(JJPCZB07)


Border effect on the integration of the Yangtze River Delta: Based on the intercity consumption flow perspective
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [31]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着社会技术的进步与市场经济的深化,消费流在反映区域间经济活动的往来程度时显现出了优势。文章借助中国银联2018年城际消费流数据,基于调整后的Head-Mayer边界效应模型,对长三角城市群的市场一体化程度进行测算和评估。实证结果表明:长三角地区的统一市场尚未完全形成,城市边界和省际边界均对异地消费具有抑制作用;省际边界效应表现出异质性,其中上海与其他三省之间的边界对消费流的影响相对较弱,而浙江、江苏、安徽三省彼此之间的市场分割更为明显;长三角各城市的边界效应程度不尽相同,上海的城市边界效应强度为1.05,江苏省各城市的边界效应强度处于3.06~5.51之间,浙江省各城市的边界效应强度介于3.13~6.24之间,而安徽省各城市的边界效应程度最为强烈,在3.85~6.58之间分布。基于长三角区域经济一体化的发展现状,提出以下几点建议:首先,要肯定区域经济协调组织在推动区域经济发展过程中发挥的重要作用。其次,继续深化取消影响区域经济发展的人为阻碍的改革,进一步降低经济合作的障碍和成本。最后,需要积极借鉴国际区域合作经验来推动长三角地区发展。

    Abstract:

    With the advancement of social technology and the deepening of market economy, consumption flow has shown its advantages in reflecting the degree of regional economic integration. Based on the China UnionPay's intercity consumption flow data in 2018, this paper applies Head-Mayer border effect model to measure and evaluate the degree of regional economic integration of the Yangtze River Delta City Group. The empirical results show that: 1)The unified market in the Yangtze River Delta region has not yet been fully formed. Both urban and inter-provincial boundaries have significant barrier effect on off-site consumption. 2)The inter-provincial boundary effect shows heterogeneity, in which the boundary between Shanghai and the other three provinces has a relatively weak impact on the consumption flow, while the market segmentation between Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces is more obvious. 3) The degree of border effect varies from city to city in the Yangtze River Delta. The intensity of the urban boundary effect in Shanghai is 1.05. The border effect of the cities in Jiangsu Province is between 3.06 and 5.51, the border effect of the cities in Zhejiang Province is between 3.13 and 6.24, and the border effect of the cities in Anhui Province, which is the most intense, ranges from 3.85 to 6.58. Based on the current situation of regional economic integration in the Yangtze River Delta, the following suggestions are put forward: first of all, the role of regional economic coordination organizations in promoting regional economic development draws our attention. Secondly, we should continue to deepen the reform of removing the artificial obstacles that affect regional economic development and further reduce the obstacles and costs of economic cooperation. Lastly, we need actively learn from the experience of international regional cooperation to promote the development of the Yangtze River Delta.

    参考文献
    [1] 张学良,李培鑫,李丽霞.政府合作、市场整合与城市群经济绩效:基于长三角城市经济协调会的实证检验[J].经济学(季刊),2017(4):1563-1582.
    [2] 刘志彪.长三角一体化发展的基础在市场一体化[N].学习时报,2019-09-30(07).
    [3] 刘雅媛,张学良."长江三角洲"概念的演化与泛化:基于近代以来区域经济格局的研究[J].财经研究,2020,46(4):94-108.
    [4] TINBERGEN J.International economic integration[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier,1954.
    [5] HAVENS R M,BALASSA B.The theory of economic integration[J].Southern Economic Journal,1962,29(1):47.
    [6] FRITZ M.The history of thought on economic integration[M].NewYork:Columbia University Press,1977.
    [7] RATTI R.Theory and practice of transborder cooperation[M].Basel, Switzerland:Helbing & Lichtenhahn,1993.
    [8] MCCALLUM J.National borders matter:Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns[J].American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623.
    [9] ENGEL C,ROGERS J.How wide is the border?[J]. American Economic Review,1996,86(5):1112-1125.
    [10] 赵永亮,徐勇.制度因素与贸易的边界效应[J].国际贸易问题,2007(9):15-21.
    [11] 吴华丽.1994-2007中国国际边界效应研究[J].中国外资,2011(6):1-2,5.
    [12] 郝景芳,马弘.引力模型的新进展及对中国对外贸易的检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,29(10):52-68,138.
    [13] 李军林,姚东旻,许晓晨.东盟区域经济一体化:基于边境效应的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2012(4):102-112.
    [14] 李天籽.中国沿边的跨境经济合作的边界效应[J].经济地理,2015,35(10):5-12.
    [15] 杨文毅,王磊,张伊娜.城际消费流的边界效应研究:以长江中游城市群为例[J].财贸经济,2019(7):127-142.
    [16] 周立群,夏良科.区域经济一体化的测度与比较:来自京津冀、长三角和珠三角的证据[J].江海学刊,2010(4):81-87.
    [17] 张衔春,刘泉,陈守强,等.城市区域经济一体化水平测度:基于深莞惠次区域的实证研究[J].城市发展研究,2019,26(7):18-28.
    [18] 陈辉煌.长三角区域经济一体化水平的测度研究[J].中国浦东干部学院学报,2011,5(4):129-131.
    [19] 张月友.长三角一体化离不开区域市场一体化[N].安徽日报,2018-12-18(11).
    [20] 刘生龙,胡鞍钢.交通基础设施与中国区域经济一体化[J].经济研究,2011,46(3):72-82.
    [21] 行伟波,李善同.本地偏好、边界效应与市场一体化:基于中国地区间增值税流动数据的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(4):1455-1474.
    [22] 李涛,周锐,苏海龙,等.长三角区域经济一体化水平的测度:以关系型大数据为基础[C]//2015中国城市规划年会论文集.贵阳,2015:7-22.
    [23] HEAD K,MAYER T.Non-Europe:The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU[J].Review of World Economics,2000,136(2):284-314.
    [24] WEI S J.Intra-national versus international trade:How stubborn are nations in global integration?[R].National Bureau of Economic Research,1996.DOI:10.3386/w5531.
    [25] 王小鲁,樊纲,余静文.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.
    [26] LEAMER E E.Access to Western markets, and Eastern effort levels[M]//ZEECHINI S. Lessons from the Economic Transition:Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s.Dordrecht:Kluwer,1997.
    [27] 赵永亮,徐勇.国内贸易与区际边界效应:保护与偏好[J].管理世界,2007(9):37-47.
    [28] BRÖCKER J.How do international trade barriers affect interregional trade[M]//ANDERSSON A E,LSARD W,PUU T.Regional and industrial development theories,models and empirical evidence.Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Publishers,1984:219-239.
    [29] PONCET S.中国市场正在走向"非一体化":中国国内和国际市场一体化程度的比较分析[J].世界经济文汇,2002(1):3-17.
    [30] 张学良,林永然,孟美侠.长三角区域一体化发展机制演进[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(1):138-147.
    [31] 张学良.以新型城市合作促进长江三角洲区域一体化发展[J].区域经济评论,2019(2):80-82.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张伊娜,牛永佳,张学良.长三角一体化发展的边界效应研究——基于城际消费流视角[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(5):1-13. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2020.05.010

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:905
  • 下载次数: 1309
  • HTML阅读次数: 1466
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2020-04-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-09-24
文章二维码