认罪认罚从宽制度的刑法衔接探讨
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D925.2

基金项目:


Research on pleading guilty and confessing from the criminal law angel
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    虽然认罪认罚从宽制度目前只规定在《刑事诉讼法》之中,但其是一个综合性制度,其落实离不开刑法的衔接配合。为与刑诉法衔接配套,刑法学科有必要挖掘"认罪认罚"在刑法教义学中的含义,厘清认罪认罚与已有从宽事由的重合之处,探索"认罪认罚"在量刑从宽中的独特价值及"认罪认罚"的从宽依据。"认罪认罚"除了体现被追诉人预防刑的降低之外,还可极大地加快程序流转和提高司法效率,因而具有坦白等已有从宽事由无法涵盖的制度内涵。具体而言,认罪认罚从宽制度的刑法衔接应从以下几方面着手:刑法典对认罪认罚从宽作出原则性规定;明确认罪认罚作为量刑独立从宽事由;规定认罪认罚实体从宽的具体幅度,为认罪认罚案件量刑建议规范化和精准化提供学科支撑。

    Abstract:

    Although the confession and punishment system is currently only written in the Code of Criminal Procedure Law, it is a comprehensive system, and its implementation cannot be separated from the support of criminal law. The article focuses on the meaning of "confessing guilty and accepting punishment" in the doctrine of criminal law, clarifying the overlap between confession and punishment and the existing wide-ranging reasons, and exploring the unique value of " confessing guilty and accepting punishment". It is pointed out that in addition to the reduction of the probationary punishment of the prosecuted, the pleading guilty plea also speeds up the circulation of the procedure and improves the efficiency of the judiciary. Therefore, it has the connotation of the system that has not been covered by the confession. At the end of the article, it is proposed: the criminal code should make a principled provision for confession and confession; the criminal law should clearly recognize the confession and punishment of the entity; the criminal law provides discipline support for the standardization and precision of sentencing recommendations.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李仲民.认罪认罚从宽制度的刑法衔接探讨[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(6):165-175. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2020.04.007

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2020-04-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-12
  • 出版日期: