长期护理需求评估体系建设研究——基于地方试点与德国实践
作者:
中图分类号:

D923.8

基金项目:

中国法学会部级法学研究课题"长期护理保险的地方实践与立法建议"(CLS〔2018〕D142);国家社会科学基金青年项目"长期护理保险法律制度研究"(18CFX073)


Study on the construction of long-term care needs assessment system: Based on local pilot and German practice
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [16]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    长期护理需求评估是长期护理保险筹资与给付的联结点,直接决定了保险给付,并对长期护理保险筹资有重要影响。当前我国试点地方在长期护理需求评估制度的设计上分歧较大,虽积累了差异化的经验与案例,但地区分割不利于社会公平与社会流动。应立足于长期护理保险的社会保险属性,结合社会实际与试点效果,适当借鉴德国经验,统筹设计长期护理需求评估体系,通过"法律+行政法规+部门规章"的规范形式,精准定位评估对象,明确独立的评估主体、科学设计评估指标与评估工具、严格规范评估程序等确保评估结果的科学、客观与公正,并根据评估结果进行分级分类给付,实现长期护理保险资源流向精准。

    Abstract:

    Long-term care needs assessment is the link between financing and benefits of long-term care insurance, which directly determines the benefits and has an important impact on the financing of long-term care insurance. Now there are great differences in the design of long-term care needs assessment system in pilot areas in China. Though different experiences have been gained, regional segmentation is not conducive to social equity and social mobility. Based on the social insurance attributes of long-term care insurance, combined with social reality and local pilot, and drawing appropriate lessons from Germany, an overall long-term care needs assessment system should be designed. Through a normative form of "law + administrative regulations + departmental regulations", the assessment objects should be accurately positioned, the independent assessment subjects should be assigned, the assessment indicators and tools should be scientific designed, and the assessment procedures should be strictly specified, to ensure that the evaluation results are scientific, objective and fair. And benefits should be granted according to the classification of assessment results to realize the accurate flow of long-term care insurance resources.

    参考文献
    [1] 王跃生.中国城乡家庭结构变动分析:基于2010年人口普查数据[J].中国社会科学,2014(4):60-77.
    [2] 林志鸿.德国长期照顾制度之发展、现况及未来[J].研考双月刊,2008(6):68-79.
    [3] 和红.德国社会长期护理保险制度改革及其启示:基于福利治理视角[J].德国研究,2016(3):58-72.
    [4] 张连增,国畅.国际经验对我国长期护理保险评估体系建设的启示:以德国、荷兰、日本、韩国为例[J].未来与发展,2018(4):81-86.
    [5] 郑尚元.长期照护保险立法探析[J].法学评论,2018(1):131-139.
    [6] 高琇珠.长期照护需求评估工具之引进:日本介护评估量表台湾版之适用性[D].台北护理学院长期照护研究所,2009.
    [7] 陈明芳.福利国家的重构:以德国长期照护保险制度的建置与改革为例兼论台湾可得之借镜[J].台大社工学刊,2012(25):157-207.
    [8] SCHNEIDER U. Germany's social long-term care insurance:Design, implementation and evaluation[J].International Social Security Review,1999,52(2):31-74.
    [9] BECKER U, REINHARD H J. Long-term care in Europe:A juridical approach[M]. Springer International Publishing AG,2018:141-145.
    [10] 刘芳.德国社会长期护理保险制度的运行理念及启示[J].德国研究,2018(1):61-76.
    [11] 林谷燕.德国长照保险照顾需求性评估新论:以2017年实施之新法为中心[C].台湾科技法律研讨会,2016.
    [12] 察赫.福利社会的欧洲设计:察赫社会法文集[M].刘冬梅,杨一帆,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014:259.
    [13] 熊伟,张荣芳.财政补助社会保险的法学透析:以二元分立为视角[J].法学研究,2016(1):110-126.
    [14] 菊池馨实.社会保障法治的将来构想[M].韩君玲,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018:12.
    [15] 张盈华.老年长期照护:制度选择与国际比较[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2015:15.
    [16] 郑尚元.论工伤保险法制之完善[J].法治研究,2018(5):24-31.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

马晶,杨天红.长期护理需求评估体系建设研究——基于地方试点与德国实践[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(2):176-187. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2019.09.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:603
  • 下载次数: 1382
  • HTML阅读次数: 1509
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-13
文章二维码