TMT网络特征、知识创造与企业双元创新——制度环境与企业性质的调节作用
作者:
中图分类号:

F273.1

基金项目:

上海应用技术大学引进人才科研启动项目"核心企业主导型供应链金融生态系统形成、运行与优化研究"(39120K196028-A06);上海应用技术大学中青年教师科技人才发展基金项目"乡村振兴背景下基于共生耦合理论的乡村旅游综合体的转型研究"(39120K199041-A06);上海应用技术大学文科工程项目"网络生态视域下核心企业主导型供应链金融模式设计研究"(391100190016025-A21)


TMT network characteristics, knowledge creation and ambidextrous innovation: The moderating roles of institutional environment and firm nature
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    从现有研究看,围绕TMT社会网络、双元创新等主题的研究比较丰富,学者们针对TMT社会网络与企业创新之间的关系进行了比较深入的研究,但大多研究倾向于TMT网络对企业创新的直接影响。本研究基于社会网络理论和知识基础观,构建了制度环境与企业性质+情境因素调节下TMT网络特征对企业双元创新影响的理论模型。以238家企业为样本,首先实证检验了TMT网络特征对双元创新的影响,其次检验了知识创造是否在上述关系中具有中介作用,最后探讨了制度环境与企业性质的调节作用。实证结果表明:TMT网络特征能够促进企业的双元创新;知识创造在TMT网络特征与企业双元创新关系中具有中介作用;良好的制度环境能够强化TMT网络特征对双元创新的积极作用;相对于国有企业,非国有企业的TMT网络特征更能促进企业进行双元创新。上述研究揭示了TMT网络特征影响企业双元创新的内在机理,也为TMT网络特征与双元创新理论的发展提供了重要证据。

    Abstract:

    From the existing research, the researches on the topic of TMT social network and ambidextrous innovation is rich, scholars have conducted in-depth research on the relationship between TMT social network and corporate innovation. However, most studies just have tended to research the direct impact of TMT network on corporate innovation. Based on the social network theory and the knowledge-based view, this paper constructs a theoretical model of the influence of TMT network characteristics on ambidextrous innovation under the adjustment of institutional environment and firm nature. Taking 236 companies as samples, this paper firstly empirically tests the impact of TMT network characteristics ambidextrous innovation, and secondly tests whether knowledge creation has an intermediary role in the above relationship. Finally, it discusses the regulatory role of institutional environment and firm nature. The empirical results show that:TMT network characteristics can promote firm's ambidextrous innovation; Knowledge creation has a mediating role in the relationship between TMT network characteristic and firm's ambidextrous innovation; A good institutional environment can strengthen the positive role of TMT network characteristic in ambidextrous innovation; Compared with state-owned enterprises, the TMT network characteristics of non-state-owned enterprises are more conducive to the success of ambidextrous innovation. The above research reveals the internal mechanism of TMT network characteristics affecting ambidextrous innovation, and provides important evidence for the development of TMT network characteristics and ambidextrous innovation theory.

    参考文献
    [1] 段庆锋, 潘小换.组织间技术扩散网络对双元创新的影响研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2018(5):27-37.
    [2] 曾萍, 刘洋, 应瑛.转型经济背景下后发企业创新追赶路径研究综述:技术创新抑或商业模式创新?[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015(3):1-7.
    [3] 付丙海, 谢富纪, 韩雨卿.创新链资源整合、双元性创新与创新绩效:基于长三角新创企业的实证研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2015(12):176-186.
    [4] WEI L Q, LAU C M.Effective teamwork at the top:the evidence from China[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012, 23(9):1853-1870.
    [5] WONG S S, BOH W F.The contingent effects of social network sparseness and centrality on managerial innovativeness[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2014, 51(7):1180-1203.
    [6] HEAVEY C, SIMSEK Z, FOX B C.Managerial social networks and ambidexterity of SMEs:The moderating role of a proactive commitment to innovation[J]. Human Resource Management, 2015, 54(S1):s201-s221.
    [7] 钱锡红, 杨永福, 徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效:一个交互效应模型[J]. 管理世界, 2010(5):118-129.
    [8] 吴岩.创业团队的知识异质性对创业绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014(7):84-90.
    [9] 杨治, 郭艳萍, 张鹏程.企业间信任对组织双元创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2015(9):80-88.
    [10] 徐露允, 曾德明, 张运生.知识网络密度与双元创新绩效关系研究:基于知识基础多元度的调节效应[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2018(1):72-80.
    [11] 吴翠花, 张永云, 张雁敏.组织控制、知识创造与技术创新关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015(12):29-38.
    [12] WANG H F, ZHAO J, LI Y, et al.Network centrality, organizational innovation, and performance:A meta-analysis[J]. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2015, 32(3):146-159.
    [13] 佘茂艳, 王元地, 张莉.区域技术网络特征对企业绩效的影响[J]. 软科学, 2017(5):47-51.
    [14] 叶峥, 郑健壮.集群企业网络特征与创业行为:基于创业能力的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014(1):58-65.
    [15] BURT R S.Toward a structural theory of action:Network models of social structure, perception, and action[M]. Pittsburgh:Academic Press, 1982:55.
    [16] ROGAN M, MORS M L.A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(6):1860-1877.
    [17] DOLFSMA W, VAN DER EIJK R.Network position and firm performance-the mediating role of innovation[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(6):556-568.
    [18] BUYL T, BOONE C, MATTHYSSENS P.Upper echelons research and managerial cognition[J]. Strategic Organization, 2011, 9(3):240-246.
    [19] 魏江, 寿柯炎.企业内部知识基与创新网络的架构及作用机制[J]. 科学学研究, 2015(11):1727-1739.
    [20] LIAO Y C, PHAN P H.Internal capabilities, external structural holes network positions, and knowledge creation[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 41(5):1148-1167.
    [21] XU S C.Balancing the two knowledge dimensions in innovation efforts:An empirical examination among pharmaceutical firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(4):610-621.
    [22] 董保宝.基于网络结构的动态能力与企业竞争优势关系研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2010.
    [23] 马鸿佳, 宋春华, 郭海.战略选择、双元创新与天生国际化企业绩效关系研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2016(10):1550-1560.
    [24] CAO Q, GEDAJLOVIC E, ZHANG H P.Unpacking organizational ambidexterity:Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4):781-796.
    引证文献
引用本文

朱娜娜,徐奕红. TMT网络特征、知识创造与企业双元创新——制度环境与企业性质的调节作用[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(5):74-86. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2020.06.004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:390
  • 下载次数: 1169
  • HTML阅读次数: 1047
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-11-05
文章二维码