大数据时代个人信息法益刑法保护的应然转向——以规制非法使用个人信息为重点
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D924.3

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金一般项目"网络智能时代个人信息泛在泄露与刑法有效保护研究"(19BFX076);南京市法学会法学研究课题"《个人信息保护法》视角下侵犯公民个人信息犯罪问题研究"(NJFX2022C02);中国政法大学网络法学研究院2019年度网络法治理论研究项目


The change of criminal law protection of personal information legal interests in the era of big data: Focus on regulating illegal use of personal information
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    我国《刑法》第253条之一侵犯公民个人信息罪规定的行为类型仅限于非法获取、出售或提供个人信息代表的转移行为,没有将非法使用个人信息行为纳入规制范围,造成刑事规制出现漏洞,体现了将个人信息自主片面地理解为转移自主、忽视使用自主的法益认识缺陷,进而仅以防范非法转移个人信息为入罪逻辑,使得个人信息法益刑法保护不周延。当前个人信息已然成为网络犯罪中的关键要素,非法使用个人信息现象愈演愈烈,侵犯公民个人信息犯罪已经逐渐形成"提供者—中间商—非法使用"的完整黑色产业链,各环节分工明确、组织严密,通过非法使用个人信息实施违法犯罪活动,进而变现牟利是诱发个人信息泛在泄露以及违法交易激增的根源,刑法单纯打击制裁非法转移个人信息行为只能是治标之策,导致侵犯个人信息犯罪刑事治理效果欠佳。随着进入大数据深度挖掘应用阶段,数字经济蓬勃发展背景下根植于个人信息的人身性、财产性、公共性等复合法益属性的使用价值日益凸显,使得个人信息使用自主相较于个人信息转移自主更具核心法益地位,个人信息刑法保护的重点理应从转移环节转向使用环节。非法使用个人信息属于下游行为,对公民的人身财产安全以及社会管理秩序造成极大损害或威胁,与处于上游的非法转移个人信息行为相比,非法使用个人信息行为具有更为严重的法益侵害性,表现为法益侵害的根源性、直接性和精准性。因此,刑事立法应以需求端为导向,有必要在遵循刑法谦抑性原则的前提下合理确定非法使用个人信息行为的入罪要件与出罪事由,即以未征得信息主体同意且情节严重为危害行为,以非经匿名化处理的个人信息为行为对象,以符合个人信息合理使用的情形为违法阻却事由,既从源头上规范个人信息使用行为,又限定非法使用个人信息行为刑事入罪的边界,在保护个人信息安全的同时促进个人信息有序自由流动、合理有效利用,平衡信息主体的使用自主利益与信息处理者的正当使用利益,为数字经济高质量发展提供强有力的刑事法治保障。

    Abstract:

    The type of behavior stipulated in Article 253 of the Criminal Law of China on the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information is only limited to the transfer behavior represented by illegal acquisition, sale or provision of personal information, and the illegal use of personal information is not included in the scope of regulation, resulting in loopholes in the criminal regulation, which reflects the defects in understanding the legal interests of one-sided understanding of personal information autonomy as transfer autonomy and neglect of use autonomy. And then only preventing illegal transfer of personal information is taken as the logic of criminalization, making the criminal law protection of personal information legal interests incomplete. At present, personal information has become a key element in network crimes. The phenomenon of illegal use of personal information has become increasingly fierce. Crimes against citizens' personal information have gradually formed a complete black industrial chain of "provider-middleman-illegal use". Each link has a clear division of labor and strict organization, and illegal and criminal activities are carried out through illegal use of personal information. And then the realization of profits is the root cause of the widespread disclosure of personal information and the proliferation of illegal transactions. The criminal law can only crack down on the illegal transfer of personal information, which can only be a temporary solution, leading to poor criminal governance of crimes against personal information. As we enter the stage of deep mining and application of big data, the use value of personal, property, public and other composite legal interest attributes rooted in personal information has become increasingly prominent in context of the vigorous development of the digital economy, making the autonomy of personal information use more of a core legal interest status than the autonomy of personal information transfer. The focus of personal information criminal law protection should be shifted from the transfer link to the use link. The illegal use of personal information belongs to the downstream behavior, which causes great damage or threat to the personal and property safety of citizens and the social management order. Compared with the illegal transfer of personal information in the upstream, the illegal use of personal information has a more serious legal interest infringement, which is manifested in the root, directness and accuracy of legal interest infringement. Therefore, criminal legislation should be demand-oriented, and it is necessary to reasonably determine the incriminating elements and causes of decriminalization of illegal use of personal information on the premise of following the principle of modesty of the criminal law, that is, taking serious cases without the consent of information subject as harmful behavior, taking personal information that is not subject to anonymous treatment as the object of conduct, and taking the situation that conforms to the reasonable use of personal information as the cause of illegal obstruction. It not only standardizes the use of personal information from the source, but also limits the criminal boundary of illegal use of personal information. While protecting the security of personal information, it promotes the orderly and free flow, reasonable and effective use of personal information, balances the independent use interests of information subjects and the legitimate use interests of information processors, and provides a strong criminal rule of law guarantee for the high-quality development of the digital economy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘双阳,李川.大数据时代个人信息法益刑法保护的应然转向——以规制非法使用个人信息为重点[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(6):231-242. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2020.05.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-03
  • 出版日期: