大数据时代个人信息法益刑法保护的应然转向——以规制非法使用个人信息为重点
作者:
中图分类号:

D924.3

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金一般项目"网络智能时代个人信息泛在泄露与刑法有效保护研究"(19BFX076);南京市法学会法学研究课题"《个人信息保护法》视角下侵犯公民个人信息犯罪问题研究"(NJFX2022C02);中国政法大学网络法学研究院2019年度网络法治理论研究项目


The change of criminal law protection of personal information legal interests in the era of big data: Focus on regulating illegal use of personal information
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [32]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    我国《刑法》第253条之一侵犯公民个人信息罪规定的行为类型仅限于非法获取、出售或提供个人信息代表的转移行为,没有将非法使用个人信息行为纳入规制范围,造成刑事规制出现漏洞,体现了将个人信息自主片面地理解为转移自主、忽视使用自主的法益认识缺陷,进而仅以防范非法转移个人信息为入罪逻辑,使得个人信息法益刑法保护不周延。当前个人信息已然成为网络犯罪中的关键要素,非法使用个人信息现象愈演愈烈,侵犯公民个人信息犯罪已经逐渐形成"提供者—中间商—非法使用"的完整黑色产业链,各环节分工明确、组织严密,通过非法使用个人信息实施违法犯罪活动,进而变现牟利是诱发个人信息泛在泄露以及违法交易激增的根源,刑法单纯打击制裁非法转移个人信息行为只能是治标之策,导致侵犯个人信息犯罪刑事治理效果欠佳。随着进入大数据深度挖掘应用阶段,数字经济蓬勃发展背景下根植于个人信息的人身性、财产性、公共性等复合法益属性的使用价值日益凸显,使得个人信息使用自主相较于个人信息转移自主更具核心法益地位,个人信息刑法保护的重点理应从转移环节转向使用环节。非法使用个人信息属于下游行为,对公民的人身财产安全以及社会管理秩序造成极大损害或威胁,与处于上游的非法转移个人信息行为相比,非法使用个人信息行为具有更为严重的法益侵害性,表现为法益侵害的根源性、直接性和精准性。因此,刑事立法应以需求端为导向,有必要在遵循刑法谦抑性原则的前提下合理确定非法使用个人信息行为的入罪要件与出罪事由,即以未征得信息主体同意且情节严重为危害行为,以非经匿名化处理的个人信息为行为对象,以符合个人信息合理使用的情形为违法阻却事由,既从源头上规范个人信息使用行为,又限定非法使用个人信息行为刑事入罪的边界,在保护个人信息安全的同时促进个人信息有序自由流动、合理有效利用,平衡信息主体的使用自主利益与信息处理者的正当使用利益,为数字经济高质量发展提供强有力的刑事法治保障。

    Abstract:

    The type of behavior stipulated in Article 253 of the Criminal Law of China on the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information is only limited to the transfer behavior represented by illegal acquisition, sale or provision of personal information, and the illegal use of personal information is not included in the scope of regulation, resulting in loopholes in the criminal regulation, which reflects the defects in understanding the legal interests of one-sided understanding of personal information autonomy as transfer autonomy and neglect of use autonomy. And then only preventing illegal transfer of personal information is taken as the logic of criminalization, making the criminal law protection of personal information legal interests incomplete. At present, personal information has become a key element in network crimes. The phenomenon of illegal use of personal information has become increasingly fierce. Crimes against citizens' personal information have gradually formed a complete black industrial chain of "provider-middleman-illegal use". Each link has a clear division of labor and strict organization, and illegal and criminal activities are carried out through illegal use of personal information. And then the realization of profits is the root cause of the widespread disclosure of personal information and the proliferation of illegal transactions. The criminal law can only crack down on the illegal transfer of personal information, which can only be a temporary solution, leading to poor criminal governance of crimes against personal information. As we enter the stage of deep mining and application of big data, the use value of personal, property, public and other composite legal interest attributes rooted in personal information has become increasingly prominent in context of the vigorous development of the digital economy, making the autonomy of personal information use more of a core legal interest status than the autonomy of personal information transfer. The focus of personal information criminal law protection should be shifted from the transfer link to the use link. The illegal use of personal information belongs to the downstream behavior, which causes great damage or threat to the personal and property safety of citizens and the social management order. Compared with the illegal transfer of personal information in the upstream, the illegal use of personal information has a more serious legal interest infringement, which is manifested in the root, directness and accuracy of legal interest infringement. Therefore, criminal legislation should be demand-oriented, and it is necessary to reasonably determine the incriminating elements and causes of decriminalization of illegal use of personal information on the premise of following the principle of modesty of the criminal law, that is, taking serious cases without the consent of information subject as harmful behavior, taking personal information that is not subject to anonymous treatment as the object of conduct, and taking the situation that conforms to the reasonable use of personal information as the cause of illegal obstruction. It not only standardizes the use of personal information from the source, but also limits the criminal boundary of illegal use of personal information. While protecting the security of personal information, it promotes the orderly and free flow, reasonable and effective use of personal information, balances the independent use interests of information subjects and the legitimate use interests of information processors, and provides a strong criminal rule of law guarantee for the high-quality development of the digital economy.

    参考文献
    [1] 尼古拉·尼葛洛庞帝.数字化生存[M].胡泳,范海燕,译.北京:电子工业出版社,2017:232.
    [2] 维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格,肯尼思·库克耶.大数据时代:生活、工作与思维的大变革[M].盛杨燕,周涛,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013:104.
    [3] 齐爱民.拯救信息社会中的人格[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009:31.
    [4] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[N].人民日报,2022-10-26(04).
    [5] 涂子沛.数文明[M].北京:中信出版社,2018:36.
    [6] 操秀英.网络黑产"魔高一尺" 严刑重典才能"道高一丈"[N].科技日报,2019-12-31(4).
    [7] 李川.个人信息犯罪的规制困境与对策完善:从大数据环境下滥用信息问题切入[J].中国刑事法杂志,2019(5):34-47.
    [8] 埃里克·希尔根多夫.德国刑法学:从传统到现代[M].江溯,黄笑岩,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015:382.
    [9] 高楚南.刑法视野下公民个人信息法益重析及范围扩充[J].中国刑事法杂志,2019(2):87-96.
    [10] 乌尔里希·齐白.全球风险社会与信息社会中的刑法[M].周遵友,江溯,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2012:308.
    [11] 江波,张亚男.大数据语境下的个人信息合理使用原则[J].交大法学,2018(3):108-121.
    [12] 高富平,王文祥.出售或提供公民个人信息入罪的边界:以侵犯公民个人信息罪所保护的法益为视角[J].政治与法律,2017(2):46-55.
    [13] 刘德良.个人信息的财产权保护[J].法学研究,2007(3):80-91.
    [14] 靳宁.大数据背景下个人信息刑罚治理的合理边界:以侵犯公民个人信息罪的法益属性为例[J].黑龙江社会科学,2018(3):28-32.
    [15] 刘一帆,刘双阳,李川.复合法益视野下网络数据的刑法保护问题研究[J].法律适用,2019(21):109-117.
    [16] 高富平.个人信息保护:从个人控制到社会控制[J].法学研究,2018(3):84-101.
    [17] 康德.实践理性批判[M].韩水法,译.北京:商务印书馆,2015:95.
    [18] 宋亚辉.个人信息的私法保护模式研究:《民法总则》第111条的解释论[J].比较法研究,2019(2):86-103.
    [19] 温昱.个人数据权利体系论纲:兼论《芝麻服务协议》的权利空白[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2019(2):84-96.
    [20] 于冲.侵犯公民个人信息罪中"公民个人信息"的法益属性与入罪边界[J].政治与法律,2018(4):15-25.
    [21] 刘仁文.论非法使用公民个人信息行为的入罪[J].法学论坛,2019(6):118-126.
    [22] 林山田.刑罚学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983:128.
    [23] 刘艳红."法益性的欠缺"与法定犯的出罪:以行政要素的双重限缩解释为路径[J].比较法研究,2019(1):86-103.
    [24] 皮勇,王肃之.智慧社会环境下个人信息的刑法保护[M].北京:人民出版社,2018:172.
    [25] 喻海松.网络犯罪二十讲[M].北京:法律出版社,2018:214.
    [26] 刘宪权,房慧颖.侵犯公民个人信息罪定罪量刑标准再析[J].华东政法大学学报,2017(6):107-115.
    [27] 韩旭至.个人信息的法律界定及类型化研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2018:233.
    [28] 陈兴良.教义刑法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014:370.
    [29] 余振华.刑事违法性理论[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2001:14.
    [30] 西田典之.日本刑法总论[M].王昭武,刘明祥,译.北京:法律出版社,2013:102.
    [31] 谢琳.大数据时代个人信息使用的合法利益豁免[J].政法论坛,2019(1):74-84.
    [32] 欧阳本祺.论网络时代刑法解释的限度[J].中国法学,2017(3):164-183.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘双阳,李川.大数据时代个人信息法益刑法保护的应然转向——以规制非法使用个人信息为重点[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(6):231-242. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2020.05.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-03
文章二维码