金融资产配置行为与企业经营绩效:来自中国非金融类上市公司的经验证据
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F830

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重点项目"混合所有制改革背景下基于现代企业理论的国有企业公司治理机制创新研究"(19AGL013);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"资本市场驱动下的国有企业混合所有制改革及其公司治理机制创新"(2020CDJSK02TD03)


Financial asset allocation behavior and operating performance in enterprises: Evidence from non-financial listed companies in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    金融资产配置是非金融类企业面临的重要经营决策之一,非金融类企业的金融资产配置行为与经营绩效和实物资产投资收益之间的关系一直是金融监管部门、上市公司和投资者关注的重要问题。作者以中国非金融类上市公司2011—2018年期间的相关数据为样本,利用多元回归模型实证研究中国非金融类上市公司金融资产配置行为对经营绩效和实物资产投资收益率的影响。研究发现,中国非金融类上市公司当年金融资产配置比例与经营绩效之间、上年金融资产配置比例与本年实物资产投资收益率之间都在总体上呈现出显著的倒"U"型关系;不同产业、不同性质企业的金融资产配置比例将对经营绩效和实物资产投资收益率产生不同影响。第一产业上市公司的金融资产配置比例与经营绩效之间不存在倒"U"型关系;第二产业和第三产业、国有和非国有非金融类上市公司的金融资产配置比例与经营绩效之间的关系都呈现出显著的倒"U"型特征,即只有适度配置金融资产,才能使其经营绩效最大化。上年金融资产配置比例增加将显著提高国有非金融类上市公司本年的实物资产投资收益率,但不会对第一产业和第三产业非金融类上市公司本年的实物资产投资收益率产生显著影响;第二产业和非国有非金融类上市公司的实物资产投资收益率与其上年金融资产配置比例呈倒"U"型关系,上年金融资产配置不足(过度)将使其对本年实物资产投资收益率产生补充效应(挤出效应),适度配置上年金融资产将最大化本年的实物资产投资收益率。中央和地方各级政府以及金融监管部门应该利用市场手段引导非金融类上市公司适度配置金融资产,鼓励他们加大实物资产投资力度,缓解中国目前面临的"脱实向虚"困境;非金融类上市公司应该基于自身产业和产权属性以及金融资产配置行为对经营绩效和实物资产投资收益率的不同影响对其金融资产配置进行科学决策,认识金融资产配置不足(过度)对实物资产投资收益率的补充效应(挤出效应),配置出能使企业经营绩效和实物资产投资收益率最大化的金融资产配置比例;投资者在选择投资对象和构建投资组合过程中,应该深入分析不同产业、不同性质公司的资产配置行为,考察拟投资对象的金融资产配置行为是否满足企业经营绩效和实物资产投资收益率最大化要求,以作出有效的投资决策。文章研究结论补充和丰富了企业资产配置领域的相关研究成果,为中央和地方各级政府制定不同产业政策、金融监管部门引导金融资源流向实体经济、非金融类上市公司规范金融资产配置行为、投资者作出正确投资决策提供了决策依据。

    Abstract:

    Financial asset allocation is one of the important business decisions faced by non-financial enterprises. The relationship between the financial asset allocation behavior of non-financial enterprises and their operating performance and real asset investment returns has always been an important concern of financial regulators, listed companies and investors. Taking the Chinese non-financial listed companies from 2011 to 2018 as samples, the authors use the multiple regression model to empirically study the impact of companies' financial asset allocation behavior on operating performance and real asset investment returns. The results show that there is a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between the financial asset allocation and operating performance this year, and between the financial asset allocation last year and the real asset investment returns this year. The companies' financial asset allocation ratios of different industries and different attributes may have different effects on operating performance and real asset investment returns. There is no inverted U-shaped relationship between the financial asset allocation ratio and operating performance of listed companies in the primary industry. The relationship between the financial asset allocation ratio and operating performance of listed companies in the secondary industry and tertiary industry, state-owned and non-state-owned listed companies shows a significant inverted U-shaped characteristic. That is, only a moderate allocation of financial assets can maximize the operating performance. The increase in the financial asset allocation ratio in the previous year will significantly increase the real asset investment returns of state-owned listed companies this year, but will not affect the real asset investment returns of non-financial listed companies in the primary and tertiary industries this year. The real asset investment returns of the secondary industry and non-state-owned listed companies have an inverted U-shaped relationship with their financial asset allocation ratio in the previous year, and the insufficient (excessive) allocation of financial assets in the previous year will have a complementary effect (crowding-out effect) on the real asset investment returns this year. The appropriate allocation of financial assets in the previous year will maximize the real asset investment returns this year. Central and local governments and financial regulatory authorities should use market to guide non-financial listed companies to appropriately allocate financial assets, encourage companies to increase investment in real assets, and alleviate the dilemma of "removing reality to virtual". Non-financial listed companies should make scientific decisions on their financial asset allocation based on their own industrial and state-owned attributes and the different effects of financial asset allocation behavior on operating performance and real asset investment returns, and recognize the complementary effect (crowding-out effect) of under-allocation (over-allocation) of financial assets on the real asset investment returns, allocate the financial asset allocation ratio that can maximize the operating performance and the real asset investment returns. In the process of selecting investment objects and constructing investment portfolios, investors should deeply analyze the asset allocation behaviors of different industries and companies of different natures, and examine whether the financial asset allocation behavior of the proposed investment object meets the requirements of the maximization of operating performance and the real asset investment returns, so as to make effective investment decisions. This paper supplements and enriches relevant research in the field of corporate asset allocation, and provides decision-making basis for central and local governments to formulate different industrial policies, financial supervision departments to guide financial resources to flow to the real economy, non-financial listed companies to regulate financial asset allocation behavior, and investors to make correct investment decisions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈其安,许媛.金融资产配置行为与企业经营绩效:来自中国非金融类上市公司的经验证据[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,(4):77-90. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2022.04.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-09-08
  • 出版日期: