汽车平顺性客观评价方法
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

重庆市科委重点攻关项目资助(2008AB6018)


Objective evaluation methods of automobile riding comfort
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    现行国标GB49701996《汽车平顺性随机输入行驶试验方法》与国际上通行的振动评价方法有一定差异,而且国内对汽车平顺性的特点研究不够深入。分析了国际上的几种振动评价方法。进行汽车平顺性道路试验,测量驾驶员坐垫处、靠背处、脚以及坐垫转动等10个轴向的振动,以期全面分析汽车平顺性的特点,进而提出合理的客观评价方法。试验表明座椅垂向振动加权系数wk和wb对振动评价指标影响很小;利用时域法分析得振动的峰值因子在4~8之间;分析了各轴向振动所占的比重,发现坐垫垂向振动、靠背前后振动和坐垫俯仰角振动对

    Abstract:

    There is much difference between GB49701996 Method of random input running testAutomotive ride comfort and international evaluation methods, and the characters of automobile riding comfort is not discussed in detail. The measurement and evaluation methods are discussed. The tenaxis vibrations exposed to human body in automobile are measured throughout road testing, and then the characteristic of automobile riding comfort is analyzed. An objective measurement and evaluation method of automobile riding comfort are presented. The results show that the difference generated by frequency weighting factors ωk and ωb is very little. The crest factor of vibration in automobiles is about 4~8 by timedomain analysis. The percentage of each axis vibration is calculated, the results show that vertical vibration (zaxis) at seat surface, horizontal vibration (xaxis) at backrest and pitch vibration (rx axis) at seat surface are most important for comfort. The evaluation method in GB49701996 underestimates the vibration expose on the human body about 3 dB, which should be revised. Based on the results, a simple and convenient method for measuring vibration on automobiles is presented.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张志飞,徐中明,贺岩松.汽车平顺性客观评价方法[J].重庆大学学报,2010,33(4):14-20.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码