主余震作用下山地掉层框架结构的损伤评估
作者:
中图分类号:

TU398

基金项目:

重庆市建设科技计划项目(2016-07);国家自然科学基金项目(51638002)


Damage assessment of step-terrace frame structure on the slope under the main-after shock
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [11]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    参考我国现行规范设计了3个不同掉层数与掉跨数的山地掉层框架结构(掉两层三跨结构、掉两层两跨结构、掉三层两跨结构)以及1个普通平地框架结构,采用增量动力分析方法(incremental dynamic analysis,IDA),以Park-Ang损伤指数作为结构响应(damage measures,DM)参数,以(peak ground acceleration,PGA)作为地震动强度(intensity measures,IM)参数,考虑余震的附加影响,从构件附加损伤指数、层损伤指数、整体损伤指数方面对掉层框架结构进行了损伤评估。研究结果表明,主震是引起结构损伤最重要的因素。掉层结构上接地层的损伤最严重,随着PGA的增大,掉层结构各构件的附加损伤指数增大,上接地柱的附加损伤最大。山地掉层结构的整体损伤大于普通平地结构的整体损伤;在主震幅值相同时,PGA越大,余震对结构的附加损伤也越大,且余震对掉层结构的附加损伤程度较平地结构更大,山地结构和普通平地结构的损伤指数比按C2K3、C3K2、C2K2、ORD依次减小。

    Abstract:

    Three structures with different layers and crosses and an ordinary flat frame structure were designed with reference to the current norms of China. Taking the Park-Ang damage index as the parameter of structural response, and peak ground a cceleration (PGA) as the parameter of the ground motion intensity and considering the additional effects of aftershocks, damage assessment of the layered structure was carried out by the incremental dynamic analysis in rspects of the additional damage index, the layer damage index and the overall damage index. The results show that the main shock is the most important factor causing structural damage. The damage of the upper ground layer is the most serious, the additional damage index of the components of the layer structure increases, and the additional damage of the upper grounding column is the largest. The global damage of the layered structure on the slop is greater than that of ordinary flat structure, the damage index ratio decreases in turn according to C2K3、C3K2、C2K2 and ORD.

    参考文献
    [1] 杨佑发,王一功,李元初.山区台地框架建筑抗震性能研究[J].振动与冲击,2007,26(6):36-40,51.YANG Youfa, WANG Yigong, LI Yuanchu. Study on seismic resistance behavior of the frame connected with ground by not only the first floor[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2007, 26(6):36-40,51.(in Chinese)
    [2] 王一功,杨佑发.多层接地框架土-结构共同作用分析[J].世界地震工程,2005,21(3):88-93.WANG Yigong, YANG Youfa. A study on dynamic interaction problem of multistory frames located at hillside sites with different slopes[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 21(3):88-93.(in Chinese)
    [3] 王丽萍,李英民,郑妮娜,等.5·12汶川地震典型山地建筑结构房屋震害调查[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,41(6):822-826.WANG Liping, LI Yingmin, ZHENG Nina, et al. Seismic damage investigation on typical slope building in Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 2009, 41(6):822-826.(in Chinese)
    [4] Mahin S A. Effects of duration and aftershocks on inelastic design earthquakes[C]. In:Proceedings of the seventh world conference on earthquake engineering, 1980,5:677-679.
    [5] 欧进萍,吴波.有损伤压弯构件的恢复力试验研究及其应用[J].建筑结构学报,1995,16(6):21-29.OU Jinping, WU Bo. Experimental research on restoring force of damaged compresson-flexcure members and its applications[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 1995, 16(6):21-29.(in Chinese)
    [6] Amadio C, Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S. The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of SDOF systems[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2003, 32(2):291-308.
    [7] Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3):491-514.
    [8] Sakamoto M, Hasegawa A, Sugaya K, et al. Probabilistic Response Assessment for Building-Specific Loss Estimation[J]. Bioimages, 2003, 11:1-8.
    [9] 陆新征,叶列平,潘鹏,等.钢筋混凝土框架结构拟静力倒塌试验研究及数值模拟竞赛Ⅰ:框架试验[J].建筑结构,2012,42(11):19-22,26.LU Xinzheng, YE Lieping, PAN Peng, et al. Pseudo-static collapse experiments and numerical prediction competition of RC frame structure Ⅰ:RC frame experiment[J]. Building Structure, 2012, 42(11):19-22,26.(in Chinese)
    [10] Kent D C. Inelastic Behavior of Reinforce Concrete Members with Cyclic Loading[D]. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1989.
    [11] 中国建筑学会建筑结构防倒塌专业委员会.钢筋混凝土框架结构拟静力倒塌试验研究及数值模拟竞赛Ⅲ:模拟结果分析[J].建筑结构,2012,42(11):27-30.Collapse Prevention Committee of Architectural Society of China. Pseudo-static collapse experiments and numerical prediction competition of RC frame structure Ⅲ:simulation results analysis[J].Building Structure,2012,42(11):27-30.(in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

杨佑发,梁婷,谭曦.主余震作用下山地掉层框架结构的损伤评估[J].重庆大学学报,2019,42(3):25-36.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:592
  • 下载次数: 965
  • HTML阅读次数: 487
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-04-09
文章二维码