新型列控系统列车追踪间隔的优化及效能评估
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.兰州交通大学 自动化与电气工程学院,兰州 730070;2.西安铁路集团 西安高铁基础设施段,西安 710018;3.兰州铁路集团 银川电务段,银川 750021

作者简介:

朱爱红(1969—),女,副教授,主要从事交通信息及控制方向研究,(E-mail)791338890@qq.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

U284.48;U292.5

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52162050);中国国家铁路集团科技研究开发计划系统性重大项目(P2021T003)。


Optimization and efficiency evaluation of new train control system of headway
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, P. R. China;2.Xi’an High-speed Railway Section, Xi’an Railway Bureau, Xi’an 710018, P. R. China;3.Yinchuan Signal & Communication District, Lanzhou Railway Bureau, Yinchuan 750021, P. R. China

Fund Project:

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (52162050), Systematic major project of Science and Technology research and Development Plan of China Railway (P2021T003).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解决地铁列车运力不足,缩短列车追踪间隔,提出了新型列控系统、相对移动闭塞和协同运行三者相结合的方法,构建了列车通信协同运行模型。在该模型下,精细化前后列车冲突区域,对正线和站后折返最小追踪间隔分别优化建模,提出缩短追踪间隔的行车策略。经实际线路仿真计算,相比基于通信的列车运行控制系统(communication based train control, CBTC)列车通过能力提升了32.3%,且4A编组可以满足79.9 s的行车间隔。考虑缩短行车间隔对运营效能的影响,将运营效能量化为运输率、满载率、单位能耗、等车时间,对不同行车方案进行评估。结果表明,对于单向小时断面客流量小于6.4万的线路,通过调节行车间隔,4A编组在满足满载率下,比6A、8A编组能耗更小,等车时间更短。

    Abstract:

    In order to solve the problem of subway train capacity shortage and reduce the train headway, a method combining a new train control system, relative mobile blocking and cooperative operation is proposed. A cooperative operation model for train communication is constructed, which focuses on refining the conflict area between the front and rear trains. Additionally, the model optimizes and models the minimum headway of the mainline and the turnaround after the station. A driving strategy is also proposed to further shorten the headway. Through simulation calculations on an actual line, it is found that the train passing capacity improves by 32.3% compared with the Communication Based Train Control System. Furthermore, the 4A marshaling can achieve a headway of 79.9 s. Considering the impact of shortening the headway on operational efficiency, the operational efficiency is quantified as transportation rate, full load rate, unit energy consumption, waiting time, and different driving schemes are evaluated. The results indicate that for lines with a one-way hourly passenger flow of less than 64 000, the 4A marshaling scheme consumes less energy compared to the 6A and 8A marshaling schemes, and reduces the waiting time when the full load rate is satisfied.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱爱红,何明明,袁小梅,舒豪.新型列控系统列车追踪间隔的优化及效能评估[J].重庆大学学报,2023,46(7):86-96.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-12
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码