智能配电网故障后自愈能力评估研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.国网湖北省电力有限公司 经济技术研究院, 武汉 430000;2.国网经济技术研究院有限公司, 北京 100000

作者简介:

张雪霏(1993—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事电力行业技术经济分析研究,(E-mail)wuyue7210@163.com。

通讯作者:

李智威,男,博士,高级工程师,(E-mail)w1104299678@163.com。

中图分类号:

TP181

基金项目:

国家电网公司总部科技项目资助(5400-202056131A-0-0-00)。


Self-healing capability evaluation of smart distribution network after fault
Author:
Affiliation:

1.State Grid Hubei Economic Research Institute, Wuhan 430000, P. R. China;2.State Grid State Power Economic Research Institute, Beijing 100000, P. R. China

Fund Project:

Supported by the Science and Technology Project of the Headquarters of State Grid Corporation of China (5400-202056131A-0-0-00).

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [23]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    自愈能力作为智能电网的主要特征具有重要的研究意义,但迄今为止尚未有全面的智能配电网自愈能力衡量标准。现有的智能配电网自愈评估主要存在量化指标不全面、忽视自愈过程中的不确定性等问题,导致评估不准确,估值高于实际结果。为了解决上述问题,提出自愈可信度、自愈率、自愈速度和自愈效益4个量化指标,涵盖了配电网故障后负荷恢复的速度、可持续时间和经济效益等因素。在上述指标的基础上,利用信息熵的方法提出了一个综合评价指标——自修复性能;引入不确定性理论来定量描述自愈的不确定性,以解决在自愈评估过程中的不确定性和样本不足的问题。最后,利用构建的含7个区段的配电系统结构进行仿真分析,验证了所提评价指标和评估方法的有效性和准确性。

    Abstract:

    The self-healing characteristic is a key aspect of smart grids and holds important research significance. However, a comprehensive measurement standard for assessing the self-healing ability of smart distribution networks has not yet been established. Existing evaluations of self-healing in smart distribution networks suffer from various issues, such as incomplete quantitative indicators and neglecting uncertainties in the process of self-healing. These problems leads to inaccurate evaluation and higher-than-actual results. To address these challenges, four quantitative indexes, namely, self-healing credibility, self-healing rate, self-healing speed and self-healing benefit are proposed. These indicators encompass factors such as the speed of load recovery, duration of sustainability, and economic benefits following faults in the distribution network. Being built upon these indicators, a comprehensive evaluation metric called “self-repair performance” is proposed using the method of information entropy. Uncertainty theory is introduced to quantitatively describe the uncertainty of self-healing so as to solve the problems of uncertainty and insufficient samples in the evaluation process. A simulation analysis is conducted on a constructed power distribution system with 7 sections to validate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed evaluation indexes and method.

    参考文献
    [1] 祁琪, 姜齐荣, 许彦平. 智能配电网柔性互联研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(12): 4664-4676.Qi Q, Jiang Q R, Xu Y P. Research status and development prospect of flexible interconnection for smart distribution networks[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(12): 4664-4676. (in Chinese)
    [2] Le J, Wang C, Zhou W, et al. A novel PLC channel modeling method and channel characteristic analysis of a smart distribution grid[J]. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2017, 2(1): 14.
    [3] Zhang B H, Hao Z G, Bo Z Q. New development in relay protection for smart grid[J]. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2016, 1(1): 1-7.
    [4] 贾冠龙, 陈敏, 赵斌, 等. 柔性多状态开关在智能配电网中的应用[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34(8): 1760-1768.Jia G L, Chen M, Zhao B, et al. Application of flexible multi-state switch in intelligent distribution network[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(8): 1760-1768. (in Chinese)
    [5] 裴宇婷, 秦超, 余贻鑫. 基于LightGBM和DNN的智能配电网在线拓扑辨识[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2020, 53(9): 939-950.Pei Y T, Qin C, Yu Y X. Online topology identification for smart distribution grids based on LightGBM and deep neural networks[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2020, 53(9): 939-950. (in Chinese)
    [6] Mirshekali H, Dashti R, Keshavarz A, et al. A novel fault location methodology for smart distribution networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(2): 1277-1288.
    [7] Corporation IBM. IBM end-to-end security for smart grids[R]. New York: IBM Corporation, 2009.
    [8] U.S. Department of Energy. Smart grid system report[R]. New York: U.S. Department of Energy, 2009.
    [9] Davis K R, Davis C M, Zonouz S A, et al. A cyber-physical modeling and assessment framework for power grid infrastructures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 6(5): 2464-2475.
    [10] 赵良. 适应智能电网发展的电网规划评价模型与方法[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2016.Zhao L. Research on power grid planning evaluation model and method suited to smart grid development[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [11] De Quevedo P M, Contreras J, Mazza A, et al. Reliability assessment of microgrids with local and mobile generation, time-dependent profiles, and intraday reconfiguration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018, 54(1): 61-72.
    [12] 倪敬敏, 何光宇, 沈沉, 等. 美国智能电网评估综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2010, 34(8): 9-13, 66.Ni J M, He G Y, Shen C, et al. A review of assessment of smart grid in America[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2010, 34(8): 9-13, 66. (in Chinese)
    [13] 李晖.电网发展评估方法与模型研究[EB/OL]. (2012-05-31) [2021-10-29]. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=SNAD&filename=SNAD000001435737.Li H. Research on evaluation method and model of power grid development [EB/OL]. (2012-05-31) [2021-10-29]. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=SNAD&filename=SNAD000001435737.(in Chinese)
    [14] 李天友, 徐丙垠. 智能配电网自愈功能与评价指标[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2010, 38(22): 105-108.Li T Y, Xu B Y. Self-healing and its benchmarking of smart distribution grid[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2010, 38(22): 105-108. (in Chinese)
    [15] Zhao H R, Li T Y, Fu L W, et al. The research on comprehensive benefits evaluation of smart grid self-healing[C]//2012 China International Conference on Electricity Distribution, September 10-14, 2012, Shanghai, China. IEEE, 2012: 1-12.
    [16] 李振坤, 赵向阳, 朱兰, 等. 智能配电网故障后自愈能力评估[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42(3): 789-796.Li Z K, Zhao X Y, Zhu L, et al. Evaluation of self-healing ability for smart distribution network after failure[J]. Power System Technology, 2018, 42(3): 789-796. (in Chinese)
    [17] 应益强, 付蓉, 黄校娟, 等. 基于不确定性优化理论的电网三级电压控制策略[J]. 电器与能效管理技术, 2019(8): 60-66.Ying Y Q, Fu R, Huang X J, et al. Three-level voltage control strategy for power grid based on uncertainty optimization theory[J]. Electrical & Energy Management Technology, 2019(8): 60-66. (in Chinese)
    [18] Falahati B, Fu Y, Wu L. Reliability assessment of smart grid considering direct cyber-power interdependencies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012, 3(3): 1515-1524.
    [19] 陈艳波, 谢瀚阳, 王金丽, 等. 基于不确定测度的电力系统抗差状态估计(一)理论基础[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(1): 8-15.Chen Y, Xie H, Wang J, et al. Uncertain measure based robust state estimation of power system: Part one theoretical principle[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(1):8-15. (in Chinese)
    [20] Halil?evi? S S, Gubina F, Gubina A F. The uniform fuzzy index of power system security[J]. European Transactions on Electrical Power, 2010, 20(6): 785-799.
    [21] 陈艳波, 刘洋, 张籍, 等. 基于改进SEC模型的新一代智能变电站设计方案评价[J]. 2017, 41(4): 1308-1314.Chen Y B, Liu Y, Zhang J, et al. An evaluation method of design scheme for new generation smart substation based on improved SEC[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(4): 1308-1314. (in Chinese)
    [22] Wei L, Yuan Z X, Yan Y Y, et al. Evaluation of energy saving and emission reduction effect in thermal power plants based on entropy weight and PROMETHEE method[C]//2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), May 28-30, 2016, Yinchuan, China. IEEE, 2016: 143-146.
    [23] Logenthiran T, Srinivasan D, Shun T Z. Demand side management in smart grid using heuristic optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012, 3(3): 1244-1252.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张雪霏,李智威,姜英涵,唐学军,董力通,孙利平,周秋鹏.智能配电网故障后自愈能力评估研究[J].重庆大学学报,2023,46(11):119-128.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:370
  • 下载次数: 881
  • HTML阅读次数: 62
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-28
文章二维码