榫卯-灌浆套筒混合连接装配式方墩轴压性能研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.福建理工大学 福建省土木工程新技术与信息化重点试验室,福州 350118;2.福州大学 土木工程学院,福州 350108;3.福建省交通规划设计院有限公司,福州 350004;4.福建省榕圣市政工程股份有限公司,福州350002

作者简介:

林上顺(1972—),男,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事预制拼装桥梁方向研究,(E-mail)578982122@qq.com。

中图分类号:

U433.22

基金项目:

福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2019J01779,2019H6020,2020J1477);福州市科技成果转移转化资助项目(2020-GX-18)。


Experimental study on axial compressive performance of assembled square pier with tenon and mortar sleeve hybrid connection
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Information in Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, P. R. China;2.School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, P. R. China;3.Fujian Transportation Planning and Design Institute, Fuzhou 350004, P. R. China;4.Fujian Rongsheng Municipal Engineering Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350002, P. R. China

Fund Project:

Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2019J01779, 2019H6020 and 2020J1477), and Fuzhou Scientific and Technological Achievements Transfer and Transformation Project(2020-GX-18).

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [16]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    已有研究表明,榫卯-灌浆套筒混合连接装配式方墩(简称混合连接拼装桥墩)的抗震性能接近于整体现浇桥墩。为进一步探讨混合连接拼装桥墩的轴压性能,以钢管的长度、直径以及壁厚等为变化参数,进行1个整体现浇桥墩(编号ZT)和4个混合连接拼装桥墩(编号GTA-0~GTD-0)的轴压承载力试验,结果表明,GTA-0~GTD-0试件的承载力比ZT试件提高了10.1%~14.4%,其延性系数均大于ZT试件;GTA-0~GTD-0试件的轴压承载力随钢管直径和长度的增大而增大,而钢管壁厚对于试件承载力的影响较小;拼装桥墩的破坏位置随着钢管长度的增加而上移,逐渐接近于整体现浇桥墩,但二者的破坏模式基本相同。

    Abstract:

    Existing studies have shown that the seismic performance of the mortise and grouting sleeve mixed connection assembled square pier (referred to as the mixed connection assembled pier) is close to that of the integral cast-in-place pier. In order to further explore the axial compression performance of the mixed-connected bridge piers, a series of axial compressive tests were conducted on one integral cast-in-place bridge pier (No. ZT) and four mixed connection and assembled bridge piers (No. GTA-0~GTD-0) with varying parameters such as the length, diameter and wall thickness of the steel pipes. The results show that the bearing capacity of GTA-0~GTD-0 specimens increased by 10.1% to 14.4% compared to the ZT specimens, and their ductility coefficients were all greater than that of ZT specimens. The axial compression bearing capacity of GTA-0~GTD-0 specimens increased with the diameter and length of the steel pipe, while the wall thickness of the steel pipe had a relatively minor impact on the bearing capacity. The damage position of the assembled bridge pier moves upward with the increase of the steel pipe length, gradually approaching the integral cast-in-place bridge pier, but the failure modes of the two are basically the same.

    参考文献
    [1] Billington S L, Barnes R W, Breen J E. A precast segmental substructure system for standard bridges[J]. PCI Journal, 1999, 44(4): 56-73.
    [2] 王志强, 葛继平, 魏红一. 东海大桥预应力混凝土桥墩抗震性能分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(11): 1462-1466, 1500.Wang Z Q, Ge J P, Wei H Y. Seismic performance of prestressed concrete bridge column of East Sea bridge[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2008, 36(11): 1462-1466, 1500.(in Chinese)
    [3] 郭熙冬. 港珠澳大桥承台墩身工厂化预制施工技术[J]. 桥梁建设, 2014, 44(2): 107-111.Guo X D. Construction techniques for factory precasting of pile caps and pier shafts of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(2): 107-111.(in Chinese)
    [4] Haber Z B, Saiidi M S, Sanders D H. Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2014, 111(3): 639-650.
    [5] Ameli M J, Parks J E, Brown D N, et al. Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column-to-cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction[J]. PCI Journal, 2015, 60(2): 80-103.
    [6] 谭逸波, 谭昱, 陈儒发, 等. 分节式预制墩身干接缝施工关键技术应用研究[J]. 公路, 2015, 60(11): 83-86.Tan Y B, Tan Y, Chen R F, et al. Study on application of key technology in dry joint construction of segmental precast pier shaft[J]. Highway, 2015, 60(11): 83-86.(in Chinese)
    [7] 王景全, 王震, 高玉峰, 等. 预制桥墩体系抗震性能研究进展: 新材料、新理念、新应用[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(3): 1-23.Wang J Q, Wang Z, Gao Y F, et al. Review on aseismic behavior of precast piers: new material, new concept, and new application[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(3): 1-23.(in Chinese)
    [8] 朱万旭, 覃荷瑛, 甘国荣, 等. 港珠澳大桥节段预制桥墩高强钢筋联接锚固体系的关键技术研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2017, 39(5): 118-124.Zhu W X, Qin H Y, Gan G R, et al. Key techniques of prestressed high-strength rebar anchorage structure for segmental precast piers of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao bridge[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(5): 118-124.(in Chinese)
    [9] 葛继平, 高飞, 郑焕强, 等. 灌浆套筒装配式桥墩的施工工艺及其应用[J]. 应用技术学报, 2018, 18(2): 146-151.Ge J P, Gao F, Zheng H Q, et al. The construction technology and application of grouting sleeve in assembly bridge pier column[J]. Journal of Technology, 2018, 18(2): 146-151.(in Chinese)
    [10] 欧智菁, 谢铭勤, 秦志清, 等. 带钢管剪力键的装配式混凝土桥墩抗震性能[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(6): 1169-1175, 1191.Ou Z J, Xie M Q, Qin Z Q, et al. Study on seismic behavior of prefabricated concrete piers with steel tube shear keys[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(6): 1169-1175, 1191.(in Chinese)
    [11] 葛继平, 闫兴非, 王志强. 2段式预制拼装预应力混凝土桥墩的抗震性能[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2017, 14(11): 2390-2398.Ge J P, Yan X F, Wang Z Q. Seismic performance analysis of two-segment bridge columns with prestressing bars[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 14(11): 2390-2398.(in Chinese)
    [12] 林上顺, 夏樟华, 赵凌志, 等. 预制拼装PC箱形墩双向拟动力试验研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2019, 49(5): 33-38.Lin S S, Xia Z H, Zhao L Z, et al. Bidirectional pseudo-dynamic test of precast and assembled prestressed concrete box pier[J]. Bridge Construction, 2019, 49(5): 33-38.(in Chinese)
    [13] 魏红一, 肖纬, 王志强, 等. 采用套筒连接的预制桥墩抗震性能试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(7): 1010-1016.Wei H Y, Xiao W, Wang Z Q, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of precast bridge pier with grouted splice sleeve[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(7): 1010-1016.(in Chinese)
    [14] 王志强, 卫张震, 魏红一, 等. 预制拼装联接件形式对桥墩抗震性能的影响[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(5): 74-80.Wang Z Q, Wei Z Z, Wei H Y, et al. Influences of precast segmental connector forms on seismic performance of bridge pier[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(5): 74-80.(in Chinese)
    [15] 上海市城乡建设和管理委员会. 预制拼装桥墩技术规程: DG/TJ 08-2160-2015[S]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2015.Shanghai Urban-Rural Construction and Management Commission. Technical specification for prefabricated bridge piers: DG/TJ 08-2160-2015[S]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2015.(in Chinese)
    [16] 杨刚, 许斌, 陈洪兵. 钢筋混凝土柱破坏过程扩展有限元数值模拟[J]. 应用力学学报, 2018, 35(3): 602-608, 693.Yang G, Xu B, Chen H B. Simulation of failure process of reinforced concrete columns with extended finite element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2018, 35(3): 602-608, 693.(in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

林上顺,何乐,夏樟华,秦志清,张乐彤,陈治雄.榫卯-灌浆套筒混合连接装配式方墩轴压性能研究[J].重庆大学学报,2024,47(6):58-67.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:769
  • 下载次数: 896
  • HTML阅读次数: 45
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-20
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-02
文章二维码