山地掉层框架-消能摇摆墙结构的易损性分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.重庆大学,山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045;2.重庆大学,土木工程学院,重庆 400045

作者简介:

杨佑发(1968—),博士,教授,主要从事工程结构抗震与减震等方向的研究, (E-mail)yfyang@cqu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU352.1

基金项目:

重庆市建设科技计划项目(城科字 2023 第 3-14 号)。


Seismic fragility analysis of step-terrace frame structures with energy-dissipating rocking walls in mountain cities
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P. R. China;2.School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P. R. China

Fund Project:

Supported by Chongqing Construction Science and Technology Project (2023-3-14).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摇摆墙可以控制结构整体变形模式和塑性耗能的分布,抑制薄弱层产生。掉层框架结构存在严重的侧向刚度不规则和楼层承载力突变以及上接地层变形集中的问题,为改善山地掉层框架结构的层屈服破坏模式,对其附加底部铰接的摇摆墙,以期控制结构的屈服机制,为进一步减小结构的地震响应和限制残余变形,提出了含屈曲约束支撑(buckling-restrained brace,BRB)的山地掉层框架-消能摇摆墙结构体系。建立了7度(0.15g)区典型的普通山地掉层框架结构、山地掉层框架-摇摆墙结构和山地掉层框架-消能摇摆墙结构的数值模型,通过模拟掉层框架结构低周反复加载试验,验证了模型和参数的合理性,采用增量动力时程分析(incremental dynamic analysis,IDA),针对IDA曲线簇、分位曲线、地震概率需求模型、易损性函数、破坏状态概率、易损性指数、抗倒塌储备系数和安全裕度比等方面,系统探讨了山地掉层框架-消能摇摆墙结构体系的易损性。结果表明,相同PGA的地震激励下,摇摆墙可以限制结构塑性发展深度,降低峰值响应离散性和各性能水准的超越概率,抗倒塌性能良好。附加BRB能够进一步提高摇摆墙-框架结构的抗震性能与抗倒塌性能。3种结构中掉层框架-消能摇摆墙结构的抗震性能和抗倒塌性能最优,纯掉层框架结构最差。

    Abstract:

    Rocking walls offer advantages in controlling deformation modes and preventing weak-story failures. Step-terrace frame structures suffer from significant structural deficiencies, including irregular lateral stiffness distribution, abrupt changes in floor load-bearing capacity, and concentrated deformation in upper stories. To improve the yielding mechanism and mitigate unfavorable failure modes, a bottom-hinged rocking wall was introduced to regulate the structural response. Furthermore, to reduce seismic responses and limit residual deformations, a step-terrace frame-energy-dissipating rocking wall structural system incorporating buckling-restrained braces (BRB) was proposed. Numerical models of ordinary step-terrace frame structures, step-terrace frame-rocking wall structures, and step-terrace frame-energy-dissipating rocking wall structures were developed for a seismic intensity 7 region (0.15g) using OpenSEES. The reliability of the numerical models and material parameters was verified by simulating low-cycle reversed loading tests of step-terrace frame structures. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) was then performed to systematically evaluate the seismic fragility of the step-terrace frame-energy-dissipating rocking wall structure, considering IDA curve clusters, partition curves, seismic demand probability models, fragility functions, damage-state exceedance probabilities, fragility indices, collapse resistance reserve factors, and safety margin ratios. The results indicate that, under seismic excitations with the same peak ground acceleration (PGA), rocking walls effectively limit the development of structural plasticity, reduce response dispersion, and decrease the probability of exceeding various performance levels, thereby exhibiting enhanced collapse resistance. The incorporation of BRB further improves the seismic performance and collapse resistance of the rocking wall-frame system. Among the investigated 3 kinds of structures, the step-terrace frame-energy dissipating rocking wall structure exhibits the best seismic behavior and collapse performance, while the conventional step-terrace frame structure shows the poorest performance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨佑发,金鸿慎.山地掉层框架-消能摇摆墙结构的易损性分析[J].重庆大学学报,2026,49(3):94-106.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-29
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码