公用事业间接管制定价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F062.9

基金项目:


Indirect Regulation Pricing Methods of Public Utility
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对公用事业间接管制定价的资本收益率定价法、上限管制定价法及其利弊进行了分析,研究表明,资本收益率定价法交易成本高,并可能产生A-J效应,形成过度投资;RPI-X上限管制定价中,RPI-X的确定不尽合理.提出的公用事业综合间接管制定价思路为:综合收益率管制与上限管制的优点,形成扩大生产能力与提高生产效率的双重激励.新增项目初期定价可采用资本收益率定价法以激励资本投入,项目建成使用的后期宜采用上限管制机制以提高企业效率.

    Abstract:

    The author analyses the advantages and disadvantages of common indirect regulation pricing methods of public utility goods. It is pointed out that it results in high trade-cost and A-J effect binging in an excess of investment when capital yield method be used. It is not reasonable enough in setting PRI-X of PRI-X pricing method. An integrated indirect regulation pricing method is put forward which is to form a two-tier incentive mechanics both in expanding producing ability and improving efficiency. In initial stages of new public project, capital yield method should be used in order to activate investment motive. Upper-limit pricing method should be used in anaphase in order to improve the producing efficiency.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

苏素.公用事业间接管制定价[J].重庆大学学报,2004,27(5):155-158.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2003-12-30
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: