3E+3E工程化教学理念下的结构力学一流课程建设
作者:
中图分类号:

G642.3;TU311

基金项目:

2021年北京交通大学教学改革研究与建设项目


First-class course construction of structural mechanics under the engineering teaching idea of "3E+3E"
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    结构力学课程是土木工程、铁道工程、水利工程等专业的核心专业基础课,是连接基础课和专业课的重要桥梁。北京交通大学结构力学获批2020年首批国家线下一流本科课程,标志着结构力学课程建设和人才培养工作进入了一个新阶段。针对课程建设过程中遇到的问题和难点,教学团队以立德树人为根本,以培养未来多元化、创新性卓越人才为目标,以提高课程的高阶性、突出课程的创新性、增加课程的挑战度为课程建设的基本要求,提出"感性入手,理性探究"的"3E+3E"工程化教学理念。在教学实施过程中,从课程思政的承载、教学目标的优化、教学方法创新方面进行了探索和实践。教学实践表明,"3E+3E"工程化教学理念不仅为"课程思政"和"两性一度"的融合提供了新思路,而且为知识、能力、素质全面发展的人才培养创造了条件,为"传授式"教学向"探究式"教学转变探索了一条有效途径。

    Abstract:

    Structural mechanics is one of the professional foundation courses for the civil engineering, railway engineering, hydraulic engineering, and plays the role of bridge between the foundation course and the professional course. The structural mechanics course of Beijing Jiaotong University is firstly approved to be first-class course in 2020, which indicates the course construction and the talent cultivation are in a new stage. In order to find a way out of the problems and difficulties during the construction of structural mechanics, the "3E+3E" engineering teaching idea following "first emotional perception, then rational exploration" is proposed, in which the moral cultivation plays the guiding role, the diversified and distinguished engineering talents with innovation spirits is taken for the cultivating goal, and improving high level course, highlighting innovation, and increasing challenge level are the basic requirements of course construction. With the ideological and political education, optimization of teaching objectives, innovation of teaching methods during the teaching process, the first-class course construction of structural mechanics is explored. Teaching practice shows that "3E+3E" teaching idea provides the new thinking for the construction of "ideological and political education" and "high-level, innovative and challenging course", creates the conditions for realizing the talents training with knowledge, capacity, and quality, and explores an advantage approach to teaching transform from "imparting teaching" to "inquiry teaching".

    参考文献
    [1] 教育部关于一流本科课程建设的实施意见[EB/OL]. [2021-07-10].(2019-10-30). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html.
    [2] 张鹏,王传杰,朱强,等.弹塑性力学一流课程建设的探索与实践[J].大学教育,2021,10(4): 65-67.
    [3] 程斌,向升.结构力学课程"3W3E"教学法[J].高等建筑教育,2020,29(1):119-125.
    [4] 王达诠,陈朝晖.面向工程教育认证的结构力学课程混合式教学设计[J].高等建筑教育,2020,29(1):110-118.
    [5] 齐欣,孟庆成,余志祥,等."新工科"背景下结构力学课程重构与探索[J].广西教育学院学报,2020(5):183-187.
    [6] 周海龙,安珍.基于心流理论的结构力学教学思考[J].高教学刊,2021(1):82-85.
    [7] 樊治辰.以"茅以升教育理念"构建拔尖创新人才创新能力培养体系[J].今日中国论坛, 2013(11):106-107.
    [8] 郑玉国.结构力学课程教学应重视工程直觉的培养[J].高等建筑教育,2016,25(1):100-104.
    [9] 王青.我的课程思政观——高质量建设[C]//2021高校课程思政建设系列专题研讨会,2021.
    [10] 周海龙,李平,李昊,等.哲学观点在结构力学课程教学中的应用[J].高等建筑教育,2017,26(4): 72-74.
    [11] 沈火明.基础力学课程思政的教学设计与实施路径[C]//新时代高校力学一流课程建设名师直播课,2021.
    [12] 周桂凤.无为而治思想在基于00后大学生心理特征的高校班级管理工作中的运用探究[J].才智, 2018(7): 118,120 .
    [13] 刘媛媛,徐宝见.基于"00后"大学生特征的《形势与政策》课程创新探索—以浙江工商大学为例[J].科技视界,2019(33):152-153.
    [14] Jessica Shabatura. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Objectives[EB/OL].[2021-07-10].(2013-09-27). https://tips.uark.edu/using-blooms-taxonomy.
    [15] 王海玲.基于BOPPPS教学模式的离散数学教学改革的探索与实践[J].大学数学,2021, 37(2):18-23.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

曹艳梅,于桂兰,向宏军,徐艳秋,贾影,石志飞.3E+3E工程化教学理念下的结构力学一流课程建设[J].高等建筑教育,2022,31(2):110-118.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:500
  • 下载次数: 996
  • HTML阅读次数: 779
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-15
文章二维码