基于情境创设的3+2探究式教学改革研究及实践——以土木工程材料课程为例
作者:
中图分类号:

G642.3

基金项目:

广东省课程思政教学示范团队项目(KCSZ2011);省级大学生创新创业项目(202110564010)


Research and practice of 3+2 inquiry-based teaching reform with situation creation: Taking civil engineering materials course as an example
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [9]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    培养高素质、有担当、有创新能力的人才是高等教育的主要目标,也是高等院校"双一流"建设的必然要求。土木工程科学在大学教育培养目标中有着独特的地位,大学工程教育不仅要关注过程也应当关注目标,采用过程与目标融合的探究式教育模式具有较好的优势。本文以土木工程材料课程为例,基于探究式科学教学的基本原理、工科教育特征和专业培养目标的要求,提出构建3+2式探究式教学目标体系,涵盖知识和能力培养目标和过程、方法及态度培养目标,同时基于"最近发展区"提出创设学习情境、设置探究点及探究项目的科学方法。实践表明:该教学改革模式能够有效提高学生创新能力和科研素养,可操作性强,具有显著的科学性和创新性。

    Abstract:

    The training of students with high quality, responsibility and innovation capability is indentified as essential goal in higher education, which also is inevitable requirement of Double-First Class initiative. Civil engineering has a unique position and important roles in the training and education. It is quite necessary not only paying attentions on process, but also on purpose of engineering education. The inquiry-based education mode has the absolute superiority because of its capability of combining process and goals together. Taking civil engineering materials as an example, an inquiry-based teaching system with 3+2 goals is proposed according to the basic principles of inquiry science teaching, the characteristics of engineering education and the requirements of training goals. This system includes training goals and processes of knowledge, skills, scientific approaches and study attitude. Meanwhile, a teaching strategy which is creating learning situations, posing research questions and projects is proposed and implemented during teaching. The practice shows that this teaching mode has good efficiency on improving the innovation ability and scientific literacy of students with its strong feasibility and prominent scientificity and innovation.

    参考文献
    [1] 潘晓燕,王凤丽,董爱娟,等.独立学院土木工程专业土木工程材料课程教学改革的探索[J].高等建筑教育,2016,25(3):76-80.
    [2] 张云莲.应用型本科院校土木工程材料实验教学改革[J].高等建筑教育,2012,21(5):114-117.
    [3] 蒋慧,黄小林,王荣,等.基于"卓越工程师教育培养计划"的土木工程材料课程实践教学研究[J].高等建筑教育,2014,23(4):152-154.
    [4] O'Banion Terry.A learning college for the 21st century[M].Phoenix,AZ:Oryx Press,1977:10.
    [5] 江登英,余玲,王龙.基于创新能力培养的工程数学教学模式改革[J].教育与职业,2017(8):94-97.
    [6] The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in Research University.Reinventing undergraduate education:Three years after the boyer report[R].Stony Brook:The state University of New York,2001:13.
    [7] 博耶.美国大学教育:现状·经验·问题及对策[M].复旦大学高等教育研究所,译.上海:复旦大学出版社,1988:142.
    [8] Vygotsky L,Luria A.Tool and symbol in child development[J].Mind in Society,1978:99-174.
    [9] 朱虹,刘晓陵,胡谊.社会文化观下的教育心理思想:维果斯基的机能性系统分析视角[J].全球教育展望,2013,42(3):25-30,10.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张敏,黄奕森,何春保,杨家放,陆金驰,李庚英.基于情境创设的3+2探究式教学改革研究及实践——以土木工程材料课程为例[J].高等建筑教育,2022,31(4):136-143.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2020-10-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-24
文章二维码