城乡规划专业“三三三”育人新模式探索:东南大学的实践
作者:
中图分类号:

G642.0

基金项目:

2021年度东南大学校级“劳动教育”专项教学改革研究与实践重点项目(2021-ly-03);东南大学2020年研究生“课程思政”示范课程(MS001531)建设试点项目;教育部第二批新工科研究与实践项目初步研究成果(E-GCCRC20200305)


Exploration of “3-3-3” education mode of urban and rural planning specialty: Practice of Southeast University
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [19]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    立足新时代“三全育人”的新要求,城乡规划专业如何结合专业特点,构筑具有操作性的新型育人模式值得探索。城乡规划专业既要体现高校育人的普遍规律,也要立足专业自身特点,创新人才培养模式,开展育人实践。从“三全育人”的本质出发,结合高等教育的普遍规律,构建了全人教育、思政教育和科研育人层层递升的高校育人三层次“金字塔”体系。对照城乡规划专业特点和需求,提出基于“金字塔”体系的城乡规划专业“三三三”育人模式,即:基于全人教育理念的“三观育人”(世界观、人生观、价值观),基于思政教育的“三情育人”(世情、国情、党情),基于科研育人的“三做育人”(做人、做事、做学问)。结合东南大学城乡规划专业教学和人才培养实践,对“三三三”育人模式的具体做法和人才培养的实际成效进行了实证分析。

    Abstract:

    Based on the new requirements of three-wide education in the new era, it is worth exploring how urban and rural planning specialty construct a new operational education mode according to its own characteristics. Urban and rural planning specialty should not only reflect the general rules of education in colleges and universities, but also carry out targeted mode innovation and education practice based on the characteristics of the major itself. Started from the essence of three-wide education, and combined with the general rules of higher education, this study analyzed and constructed a three-level “Pyramid” system of education in colleges and universities, which includes holistic education, ideological and political education, and scientific research education. Further compared the characteristics and needs of urban and rural planning specialty, a new education mode for urban and rural planning specialty based on the three-level “Pyramid” system was proposed, which includes: “Sanguan Education” (view of world, view of life and values) based on the concept of holistic education, the “Sanqing Education” (global conditions, national conditions, and party conditions) based on ideological and political education, and “Sanzuo Education” (conduct oneself, do things, and academic work) based on scientific research education. Based on the teaching and talent training practice of urban and rural planning specialty of Southeast University, this study has carried out a specific analysis and demonstration on the specific practices of “3-3-3” education mode and the actual effect of talent training.

    参考文献
    [1] 刘宝存.全人教育思潮的兴起与教育目标的转变[J].比较教育研究,2004,26(9):17-22.
    [2] 张东海.全人教育思潮与高等教育实践研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007.
    [3] 钟启泉."整体教育"思潮的基本观点[J].全球教育展望,2001,30(9):11-18.
    [4] 吴立保,谢安邦.全人教育理念下的大学教学改革[J].现代大学教育,2008(1):69-74,112.
    [5] 秦树理.国外公民教育的启示[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,38(3):14-17.
    [6] 苗伟伦.公民教育——高校思想政治教育的历史转型[J].浙江海洋学院学报(人文科学版),2004,21(1):72-77.
    [7] 朱梦洁."课程思政"的探索与实践——以专业课为视角[D].上海:上海外国语大学,2019.
    [8] 林泉伶."课程思政":新时代高校思想政治教育新途径研究[D].南京:南京邮电大学,2019.
    [9] 沙军."课程思政"的版本升级与系统化思考[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2018(10):81-85,108.
    [10] 宾春婷.高校专业课教师思想政治教育功能发挥研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2019.
    [11] 王东清,刘静静.高校会计专业课程与思政教育同向同行教学改革的理论与实践探讨[J].经济师,2019(3):203-205.
    [12] 华维勇.高校专业教师的思政教育角色定位及建构途径[J].现代教育论丛,2018(2):34-39.
    [13] 张愿.高校科研育人的现实困惑与实现对策[D].荆州:长江大学,2017.
    [14] 柳逸青,王鑫,刘晓,等.高校专业课程中融入思想政治教育的难点剖析与路径探索[J].高教学刊,2018(6):141-143,146.
    [15] 唐瑕苓,范文教,刘犟,等.科研育人提升地方本科高校人才培养质量——四川旅游学院的实践与思考[J].四川旅游学院学报,2020(1):1-5.
    [16] 万里鹰,万紫涵.科研育人对大学生创新能力和素质提升的研究[J].大学教育,2017(2):145-146.
    [17] 尹万东.高校科研育人:价值、意蕴、问题与机制[J].北京化工大学学报(社会科学版),2019(4):75-81.
    [18] 张毅华.高校德育之科研育人:路在何方[J].科技视界,2018(11):155-156.
    [19] 余馀,张云怀,柴毅,等."三全育人"背景下高校实验室实践育人的探索与实践[J].高等建筑教育,2021,30(2):177-181.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王兴平.城乡规划专业“三三三”育人新模式探索:东南大学的实践[J].高等建筑教育,2022,31(6):35-41.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2021-09-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-09
文章二维码