研究生学术英语写作项目中的任务设置原则——以建筑学科为例
作者:
中图分类号:

G643.2

基金项目:

重庆市研究生教育教学改革研究项目(yjg153090);中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目“建筑学科大学英语课程改革的探索与实践”(CQDXWL-2012-091)


Task design principles of English academic writing projects for postgraduates: Taking the architectural science as an example
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [19]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着国际学术交流与合作日趋频繁,在国际顶级学术期刊上发表原创成果的多寡和引用情况,已经成为评判一所高校乃至整个国家科研能力和国际影响力的重要指标,也是评判研究生学业水平的一个重要参数。提升研究生学术英语写作能力对于促进国际学术交流、提升我国学者国际学术话语权具有积极意义。研究生公共英语课程应以需为本,只有将语言学习和学生专业学术研究相结合,才能从根本上激发学生的学习兴趣和动机。以建筑学科研究生学术英语写作教学为例,通过实例,从目的性、专业性、思辨性与合作性四个方面探讨了研究生学术英语写作项目中的任务设置原则。其中“目的性”聚焦学术英语写作能力的三大要素,即学术语言、学术技能和学术规范;“专业性”是指语言共核知识和专业文献中语言个性特征的相互结合,即教师在教学中要有意识地引导和鼓励学生自觉将专业学科知识融入语言学习中,主动将教师讲授的语言共核知识迁移至专业文献的阅读和写作中;“思辨性”关注学术英语写作过程中诸如分析、推断、评价、说明和解释等思辨能力的培养;“合作性”强调学习者能通过相互协商、沟通和协作等方式来创建和谐的学习气氛,从而克服畏难情绪,增强自信心,提升语言产出的质量。以上原则不仅对项目驱动下的研究生学术英语写作教学具有借鉴意义,切实提高学生的学术英语写作能力,实现学以致用的目标,也可对本科阶段的前期学术英语课程建设带来启示。

    Abstract:

    In today’s world where international academic communication and cooperation become frequent, publishing original research has become an embodiment of a university’s capacity, or even a nation’s capacity for scientific research and an embodiment of a country’s international influence. It is also an important parameter for assessing the academic performance of postgraduates. Enhancing students’ academic writing ability in English is essential not only in promoting international academic communication, but also in increasing the chance of making Chinese scholars heard in the international academic arena. English academic writing courses for postgraduates should be based on students’ needs, combining language study with students’ needs for academic research in their subject areas, thus enhancing their motivation and interest. Through pedagogical examples of teaching academic writing to postgraduate students majoring in architecture science, this paper discusses task design principles of English academic writing projects from the aspects of “purposefulness”, “specialism”, “critical thinking”, and “collaboration”. Among the four principles, “purposefulness” focuses on the three principal elements of academic writing ability, namely academic language, academic skills, and academic conventions. “Specialism” refers to the combination of the common core knowledge in language and the special linguistic characteristics of subject-specific discourse. This means teachers should deliberately guide and encourage students to integrate subject-specific knowledge into language learning consciously, transferring the common knowledge taught by teachers to the process of reading and writing subject-specific academic papers. “Critical thinking” concerns the ability to think critically in the process of English academic writing, such as the ability to analyze, infer, appraise, explain and interpret. “Collaboration” emphasizes learners’ ability to create a harmonious learning atmosphere through negotiation, communication and cooperation, so as to overcome the fear of difficulties and enhance self-confidence in order to improve the quality of language output. The principles mentioned above can not only have referential value for project-based English academic writing courses for postgraduates, thus enhancing students’ academic writing ability and realizing the goal of putting what they have learned into practice in the real world, but also bring some enlightenment of the undergraduate pre-course development of English academic writing.

    参考文献
    [1] 教育部. 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[EB/OL]. (2010-07-29)[2019-12-26]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/201007/t20100729_171904.html.
    [2] 教育部. 教育部财政部国家发展改革委印发《关于高等学校加快"双一流"建设的指导意见》的通知. [EB/OL]. (2018-08-27)[2019-12-26]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-08/27/content_5316809.htm.
    [3] Hyland K,Hamp-Lyons L.EAP: issues and directions[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2002, 1(1):1-12.
    [4] Stoller F L.Project work: A means to promote language and content[M]//Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press, 2002: 107-120.
    [5] 陈芳,赵秀凤.调查研究型项目在研究生英语教学中的应用[J].学位与研究生教育,2015(10):35-38.
    [6] 周梅.项目驱动下理工科博士生英语学术交流能力的培养:一项基于"国际学术交流英语"课程的实证研究[J].中国ESP研究,2019(2):100-110.
    [7] HEDGE T. Teaching and learning in the language classroom[M]. Shanghai, Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2002: 321-330.
    [8] Trimble, L. English for science and technology—A discourse approach[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992:76.
    [9] 娄宝翠,王莉.学习者学术英语写作中自我指称语与作者身份构建[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2020,43(1):93-99,160.
    [10] 盛云岚.学术英语的语境化教学——欧洲CLIL模式与美国社区大学发展性课程的启示[J].外语界,2015(5):35-41.
    [11] 蔡基刚.中国高校学术英语存在理论依据探索[J].外语电化教学,2016(1): 9-16.
    [12] Facione P A. Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction [R]. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 1989.
    [13] 马利红.基于论证的英语写作思辨能力评价效度研究[J].现代外语,2021,44(5):694-703.
    [14] 张保权.论大学生思辨能力培养的思路和方法[J].教育探索,2016(5):83-86.
    [15] 陈亚平.教师提问与学习者批判性思维能力的培养[J].外语与外语教学,2016(2):87-96,146.
    [16] 李宁,王宁.合作学习视域下我国大学生创新能力构建[J].江苏高教,2020(1):94-101.
    [17] 李宝敏,宫玲玲.合作学习对学生学习成效的影响研究——基于国内外54项实验研究和准实验研究的元分析[J].教育发展研究,2019,39(24):39-47.
    [18] 耿峰,于书林,王俊菊.同伴反馈对提升英语辩论文思辨质量的有效性研究[J].外语界,2021(3):37-45.
    [19] 周梅.研究生学术英语写作项目的评价体系建构——基于CIPP评价模型的研究[J].研究生教育研究,2021(2):43-48.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

周梅.研究生学术英语写作项目中的任务设置原则——以建筑学科为例[J].高等建筑教育,2022,31(6):68-77.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:204
  • 下载次数: 405
  • HTML阅读次数: 498
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-09
文章二维码