美国高校工程教育持续质量改进机制研究
作者:
中图分类号:

G640

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"基于多案例比较的世界一流教育学学科建设实践研究"(2018QD016)


Research on the continuous quality improvement mechanisms of engineering education within colleges and universities in the United States
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在高等教育迈入普及化阶段的时代背景下,我国提出了推动高等教育质量革命和建构质量文化的新要求,使得本科专业教育质量保障的重要性愈发凸显。美国高校工程教育探索专业教育质量持续改进的理念与实践,无疑可为我国本科专业教育质量保障提供参考。在专业认证机构的引领下,持续质量改进理念内化为美国高校专业教育质量保障实践的核心理念;持续质量改进程序逐渐优化,涵盖界定工程专业教育目标、界定预期工程专业教育产出、确定能够证明教育产出的证据等环节;持续质量改进存在方法论困境,给工科教师造成了压力和挑战,推动工科教师不断拓新方法;持续质量改进理念引领并塑造了积极的评价、实证和质量文化。

    Abstract:

    After the higher education entering the stage of popularization, China has put forward new requirements for promoting the revolution of higher education quality and constructing quality culture, making the importance of undergraduate program education quality assurance more and more prominent. Engineering education of American colleges and universities explores the theory and practice of continuous quality improvement of program education, which can provide a reference for the quality assurance in undergraduate program education in China. Under the guidance of program accreditation agencies, the concept of continuous quality improvement has been internalized by American colleges and universities as the core concept of the quality assurance of program education; the process of continuous quality improvement is gradually optimized, covering the definition of educational objectives of engineering program, the definition of expected educational outcome of engineering program, the confirmation of evidence that can prove educational outcome, etc.; the continuous quality improvement is confronted by technical dilemma which have caused pressures and challenges for engineering faculty to develop new methods; the concept of continuous quality improvement guides and forms positive assessment, empirical and quality cultures.

    参考文献
    [1] 戚业国,代蕊华.本科教学质量保障体系建设的思想与方法[J].教师教育研究,2007,19(2):6-12.
    [2] 卢晓中.论高等教育的质量及其保障问题[J].教育导刊,2001(15/16):5-8.
    [3] 马树杉.关于高等学校教育质量体系的探讨[J].江苏高教,2001(6):38-40.
    [4] 熊志翔.中国高教质量保障体系的构建[J].江苏高教,2003(1):69.
    [5] 毕家驹.高等教育质量保证小议[J].高教发展与评估,2007(4):63.
    [6] 张会敏,方向阳.全面质量管理在高等教育应用中的哲学思考[J].当代教育科学,2010(11):45-47.
    [7] ROSICZKOWSKI J W, HAHN W F. Total quality management and engineering education at Alfred University [C]//Proceedings of the 1993 Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1993.
    [8] HOGG R V. Let’s use CQI in our statistics programs [J].American Statistician,1999,53(1):8.
    [9] 杨亮.第三部门视域下美国工程教育专业认证研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2013:55.
    [10] BRANNAN K P, DION T R, FALLON D J. ABET engineering criteria 2000: assessment of classroom instruction [C]//Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.American Society for Engineering Education,1999.
    [11] 李志义.适应认证要求 推进工程教育教学改革[J].中国大学教学,2014(6):15.
    [12] 李志义,朱泓,刘志军,等.用成果导向教育理念引导高等工程教育教学改革[J].高等工程教育研究,2014(2):29.
    [13] 顾佩华,胡文龙,林鹏,等.基于"学习产出"(OBE)的工程教育模式——汕头大学的实践与探索[J].高等工程教育研究,2014(1):27.
    [14] ALDRIDGE D M, BENEFIELD L M.A model assessment plan[C]//ASEE Prism.1998.
    [15] MARY B S, LARRY J S, HARVEY W, et al.Defining the outcomes: a framework for EC2000 [J].IEEE Transactions on Education,2000,43(2):100.
    [16] SARAPIN M I.Implementing an assessment model for NAIT Accreditation[C]//NAIT 36th Annual Convention.Nashville,TN,2003:10-13.
    [17] STRONG S, AMOS S J, Callahan N R. Effective assessment: a model for industrial technology programs [J].Journal of Industrial Technology, 2003,19(3):1-7.
    [18] ZOLLARS R L..The EC2000 system in chemical engineering at Washington State University[C]//Proceedings of the 2002 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition. American Society for Engineering Education,2002.
    [19] Accreditation for WPI & Programs[EB/OL].[2015-03-02].http://www.wpi.edu/about/accreditation.html.
    [20] 余天佐,刘少雪.从外部评估转向自我改进——美国工程教育专业认证标准EC2000的变革及启示[J].高等工程教育研究,2014(6):28-34.
    [21] JENKINS M G, KRAMLICH J C. Assessment methods under ABET EC2000 at University of Washington–lessons learned: what works and what doesn’t [C]//Proceedings of the 2002 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition. American Society for Engineering Education, 2002.
    [22] EVERETT L J, ALEXANDER R, WIENEN M. A grading method that promotes competency and values of broadly talented students [J].Journal of Engineering Education, 1999.
    [23] 韩晓燕,张彦通,李汉邦.美国高等教育认证制度中的"实证文化"[J].中国高等教育评估,2003(4):28-29.
    [24] 《中国工程教育质量报告》编委会.中国工程教育质量报告(2013年度)[R].教育部高等教育教学评估中心,2014:97.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李明.美国高校工程教育持续质量改进机制研究[J].高等建筑教育,2023,32(2):20-27.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:278
  • 下载次数: 861
  • HTML阅读次数: 748
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2021-11-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-29
文章二维码