高校教师教学能力提升:概念、目标与多元路径
作者:
中图分类号:

G642.0

基金项目:

重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目(222008)


College teachers’ teaching ability ascending: concept, targets and multiple paths
Author:
  • CHEN Ke

    CHEN Ke

    Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning; National Demonstration Center for Experimental Teaching of Architectural and Urban Planning (Chongqing University); Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, P.R. China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • GONG Xiaodong

    GONG Xiaodong

    Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning; National Demonstration Center for Experimental Teaching of Architectural and Urban Planning (Chongqing University); Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, P.R. China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [21]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    高校教师教学能力提升势在必行,但对处于不同阶段和状态的一线教师而言,尚有许多问题亟待厘清。以一线教师的视角,基于边界定义法界定"高校教师教学能力"概念,即高校一线教师完成教学设计、教学实施和教学评价的能力和其自身具备的包含知识、技能和态度在内的教学专长。该能力具备从新手水平到高级新手水平、胜任水平、熟练水平和专家水平的多层次提升空间,提升方式包含渐变和突变两种。分别基于任务特征和个人特征建构高校教师教学能力提升的多层次目标,即提升教学设计、实施和评价等能力,夯实知识基础,培养发展多元技能,树立职业态度。将相关政策、理论与自身实践相结合,指出多元路径对提升教学能力的影响,并分析教学能力提升多元路径对不同水平高校教师的适用性。

    Abstract:

    It is imperative to improve the teaching competence of teachers in colleges and universities, but there are still many problems for front-line teachers in different stages and states. From the perspective of the front-line teachers in colleges and universities, the concept of "teaching competence of college teachers" is defined according to the boundary definition method, that is, the competence of the front-line teachers in colleges and universities to complete the teaching design, teaching implementation and evaluation of teaching, and their own teaching expertise, including knowledge, skills and attitudes. This competence has a multi-level upgrade space from novice level to advanced beginner level, competent level, proficient level and expert level, which includes both gradient and mutation. Based on the task characteristics and personal characteristics, we construct the multi-level goal of improving the teaching competence of college teachers, that is, to improve the teaching design, implementation and evaluation ability, as well as to strengthen the knowledge base, develop multi-skills and establish a professional attitude. Combining relevant policies, theories and the author’s practice, the paper points out the influences of the multiple paths on improving teaching competence, and analyzes the applicability of teaching competence improving paths to teachers at different levels.

    参考文献
    [1] 教育部.教育部关于加快建设高水平本科教育全面提高人才培养能力的意见[J].中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2018(9):18-24.
    [2] Stoof A, Martens R, Van Merrienboer J J G, et al. The boundary approach of competence:a constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence[J]. Human Resource Development Review, 2002, 1(3):345-365.
    [3] 蔡永红,申晓月.教师的教学专长——研究缘起、争议与整合[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2014(2):15-23.
    [4] 徐波,陈晓端.国内教师教学能力研究的现状、不足与展望——以著作为考察对象[J].当代教育与文化,2020,12(1):90-94.
    [5] Berliner, D. C. Expertise:The wonders of exemplary performance[M]. In John N. Mangieri and Cathy Collins Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students. Ft. Worth, TX:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1994:141-186.
    [6] 黄彬.高校教师教学能力评价:反思与建构[J].教育研究,2017,38(2):90-96,158.
    [7] Gonzi, A., Hager, P., & Athanasou, J.The development of competency-based assessment strategies for the professions:National office of overseas skills recognition research article no. 8[M]. Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Service, 1993:6.
    [8] Lee S. Shulman. Knowledge and Teaching:Foundation of the New Reform[J].Harvard Educational Review,1987,57(1):1-22.
    [9] MishraP, Koehler M. Technological pedagogical content knowledge:a framework for teacher knowledge[J]. Teachers College Record, 2006(108):1017-1054.
    [10] 刘献君.论"以学生为中心"[J].高等教育研究,2012,33(8):1-6.
    [11] (美)杜威(DeweyJ.).我们怎样思维:经验与教育[M]. 姜文闵,译.北京:人民教育出版社,1991.
    [12] 张广斌.教学情境研究:反思与评价[J].当代教育科学,2011(20):21-24.
    [13] 曹辉,张雨晗."景观社会"理论视域中的教学情境及其生态构建[J].教育学术月刊,2020(3):101-105.
    [14] 黄光芳,程志,张子石.泛在学习环境下自主式微博教学情境的设计探究[J].电化教育研究,2015,36(9):70-76.
    [15] Pat Pattison, Russell Day. Instructional Skills Workshop (ISW) Handbook for Participants[M]. Vancouver:UBC Centre for Teaching and Academic Growth, 2006.5.
    [16] 顾大庆.设计教学研习班作为培训设计教师的一种有效方式——记2011年全国建筑设计教学研习班[J].中国建筑教育,2012(5):5-9.
    [17] 颜莹.教师教学研究:提高专业实践能力[J].当代教育科学,2011(4):20-22.
    [18] 张忠华,苏静雷.大学青年教师知识结构与教学能力状况调查研究[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2013(3):73-78.
    [19] 金心红,徐学福.教师学科教学知识生成的内在机制[J].教育科学,2019,35(2):40-45.
    [20] 陆国栋,赵春鱼,颜晖,等.本科院校教师教学竞赛发展现状及模式创新[J].中国高教研究,2019(1):86-90.
    [21] 中国高等教育学会网站.中国高等教育学会发布"全国高校教师教学竞赛状态数据(2012-2018)"[EB/OL].(2019-06-03).[2020-06-21].http://www.hie.edu.cn/announcement_12579/20190603/t20190603_994154.shtml.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈科,巩晓东.高校教师教学能力提升:概念、目标与多元路径[J].高等建筑教育,2023,32(3):11-20.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:409
  • 下载次数: 753
  • HTML阅读次数: 843
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2022-06-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-08
文章二维码