北京外国语大学 国际教育学院，北京 100089
李明（1984—），男，北京外国语大学国际教育学院讲师，北京中外文化交流研究基地研究员，博士，主要从事高等工程教育、高等教育质量保障与评价、高等教育管理研究，（E-mail） marklee2018@ bfsu. edu. cn。
G649
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“‘一带一路’倡议下我国工程科技人才国际传播能力研究”（2022ZX014）
Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, P. R. China
正式加入《华盛顿协议》标志着我国工程教育认证体系得到国际社会认可、基本实现国际实质等效，工程教育认证工作进入新发展阶段。高等工程教育质量的复杂性决定了高等工程教育质量治理必然具有丰富的理论和实践内涵。后《华盛顿协议》时代，我国开展高等工程教育质量治理具有体系、法律和制度的优势，存在先天治理能力不足、国际化水平不高、科学化程度较低的劣势，迎来高等工程教育发展的新时代和新愿景，面临整合国际规则规范、周期资格审查的挑战。我国亟需系统构建治理目标、治理主体、治理客体、治理路径，探索具有中国特色的高等工程教育质量治理模式，为深度参与全球高等工程教育治理奠定基础。
China formally joined the Washington Accord, which symbolized that engineering education accreditation system of China has been recognized by the international engineering community, achieved international substantive equivalence, and entered a new stage of development. The complexity of higher engineering education quality determines that the quality governance of higher engineering education must have rich theoretical and practical connotations. After joining the Washington Accord, China has the strengths of system, law and institution, and weaknesses of insufficient innate governance capacity, low level of internationalization and low degree of scientization; ushers in a new era and new vision for the development of higher engineering education, and faces the challenges of integrating international rules and regulations and periodic qualification inspection, in carrying out the quality governance of higher engineering education. It is imperative for China to systematically define and establish governance objectives, subjects, objects and approaches, explore the quality governance model of higher engineering education with Chinese characteristics, so as to lay the foundation for deep participation in the governance of global higher engineering education.
李明.后《华盛顿协议》时代我国高等工程教育质量治理探究：内涵诠释、环境剖析与战略构想[J].高等建筑教育,2023,32(5):31-38.
复制
