基于设计思维的土木工程学科竞赛管理体系的建立与更新
作者:
作者单位:

西南交通大学 土木工程学院, 四川 成都 610031

作者简介:

蒲黔辉(1965—),男,西南交通大学土木工程学院教授,博士,主要从事新建桥梁及既有桥梁结构研究与评估研究,(E-mail) qhpu@home.swjtu.edu.cn。

中图分类号:

G642

基金项目:

西南交通大学本科教育教学研究与改革项目 (20201002;20201003);四川省高等教育人才培养质量和教学改革项目(JG2021-245)


Establishment and renewal of the civil engineering discipline competition management system based on design thinking
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [14]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    长期以来,各高校普遍开展学生学科竞赛活动,大学生竞赛活动已经成为学生倾慕、学校重视的重要学习和展示平台之一。从课程教学体系与学科竞赛的关系、学科竞赛组织与孵化机制等方面指出了制约学科竞赛健康发展的原因。通过引进、消化和吸收设计思维的思想,结合西南交通大学土木工程学院近几年的探索,介绍了“树德为先、学生中心、能力为重、赛教互促”的土木学科竞赛组织和管理办法1.0版及其取得的成绩,同时指出了执行过程中发现的问题。基于双一流和新工科建设背景,提出了2.0版的学科竞赛指导纲要,以期为土木学科院校及综合性工科院校提供参考。

    Abstract:

    For a long time, colleges and universities generally carry out students’ discipline competition activities, and college students’ competition has become one of the important learning and display platforms that students admire and schools attach importance to. This paper points out the reasons that restrict the healthy development of discipline competition from the aspects of the relationship between curriculum teaching system and discipline competition, discipline competition organization and incubation mechanism. By introducing, digesting and absorbing the ideas of design thinking, based on the exploration of the School of Civil Engineering in Southwest Jiaotong University in recent years, this paper introduces the 1.0 version of the organization and management method of civil engineering discipline competition, which is based on ethics, student-centered, ability-oriented, and mutual promotion of competition and teaching, and its achievements, and points out the problems found in the implementation process. Based on the background of double first-class and emerging engineering construction, the 2.0 version of discipline competition guidance is proposed. The experience and outline can be used as reference for civil engineering colleges and comprehensive engineering colleges.

    参考文献
    [1] 陆国栋,陈临强,何钦铭,等.高校学科竞赛评估:思路、方法和探索[J].中国高教研究,2018(2): 63-68, 74.
    [2] 陆国栋,魏志渊,毛一平,等.基于主题、时间、空间和模式分类的学科竞赛研究与实践[J].中国大学教学,2012(10):74-76.
    [3] Cowie B, Jones A, Otrel-Cass K. Re-engaging students in science: issues of assessment, funds of knowledge and sites for learning[J]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2011, 9(2): 347-366.
    [4] Dionne L, Reis G, Trudel L, et al. Students’ sources of motivation for participating in science fairs: an exploratory study within the canada-wide science fair 2008[J]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2012, 10(3): 669-693.
    [5] Hong J C, Chen M Y, Hwang M Y. Vitalizing creative learning in science and technology through an extracurricular club: a perspective based on activity theory[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2013(8): 45-55.
    [6] Huang N T N, Chiu L J, Hong J C. Relationship among students’ problem-solving attitude, perceived value, behavioral attitude, and intention to participate in a science and technology contest[J]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2016, 14(8): 1419-1435.
    [7] Veenman M V J, Elshout J J, Busato V V. Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 1994, 10(1): 93-106.
    [8] Woo Y, Reeves T C. Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: a social constructivist interpretation[J]. The Internet and Higher Education, 2007, 10(1): 15-25.
    [9] Liotard I, Revest V. Contests as innovation policy instruments: lessons from the US federal agencies' experience[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018(127):57-69.
    [10] Simon H A. The sciences of the artificial[M]. Cambridge,Mass: MIT Press, 1969.
    [11] Rowe P G. Design thinking[M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1987.
    [12] Buchanan R. Wicked problems in design thinking[J]. Design Issues, 1992, 8(2): 5-21.
    [13] D.school:institute of design at stanford[EB/OL]. (2016-10-18)[2022-05-10]. http://dschool.stanford.edu/.
    [14] Curedale R. Design thinking process & methods manual[M]. 2nd ed. Topanga,CA:Design Community College Incorporated,2016.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

蒲黔辉,富海鹰,占玉林,何畏,张方.基于设计思维的土木工程学科竞赛管理体系的建立与更新[J].高等建筑教育,2023,32(6):51-60.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:224
  • 下载次数: 386
  • HTML阅读次数: 58
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2022-05-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-21
文章二维码