工学类专业课程思政元素及融入途径探讨——以桥梁工程课程为例
作者:
作者单位:

1.贵州理工学院 土木工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550003;2.贵州信息科技学院 土木工程系5

作者简介:

吴安杰(1986—),男,贵州理工学院土木工程学院副教授,博士,主要从事土木工程教学与研究,(E-mail)wuanjie163@163.com。

中图分类号:

G649.21

基金项目:

贵州理工学院教育教学改革研究项目(2022KCSZ09);贵州理工学院教育教学改革课题(2022JXGG02);贵州理工学院2022年桥梁工程课程思政示范课程和线上线下混合式一流课程;贵州理工学院人才启动基金项目(XJGC20190908);贵州省科技计划基础研究项目(黔科合基础[2020]1Y248)


Discussion on the ideological and political elements and integration approaches to engineering courses: a case of bridge engineering
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Civil Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang 550003, P.R.China;2.Department of Civil Engineering,Guiyang Institute of Information Science and Technology, Guiyang 550025, P.R.China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [12]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    课程思政是落实立德树人根本任务的重要举措,深入挖掘课程教学中蕴含的思想政治教育资源是当前教育教学最基础也是最紧迫的工作。由于工学类专业课程与思想政治课教学内容有较大差别,如何充分挖掘和利用专业课中的隐性思政元素,达到课程思政和思政课程的协同育人效果,是目前专业课教师面临的新挑战。工学类专业课程知识点往往立足于力学原理,其中蕴含的哲学思维和美学是易被忽视的重要思政“宝藏”。本文通过分析工学类专业课程特点,提出了专业课程的思政目标,从哲学思维、美学、工程伦理、大国工匠精神、科技报国情怀和使命担当等方面挖掘了课程思政元素,并以桥梁工程课程为例,探索了有效融入途径,可为类似课程教学提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Curriculum-based ideological and political education is an important measure to strengthening morality education. Deeply excavating the ideological and political education resources contained in various courses is the most basic, fundamental and urgent work of current education and teaching. Due to the great difference between engineering professional courses and ideological and political courses, how to exploit and make full use of the hidden ideological and political treasures in professional courses, so as to achieve the synergistic educational effect of courses for ideological and political education and courses of ideological and political education, is a new challenge faced by professional teachers at present. The knowledge points of engineering courses are often based on the principles of mechanics, and the philosophical thinking and aesthetics contained therein are important ideological and political treasures that are easily ignored. This paper first analyzes the characteristics of engineering professional courses, then puts forward the ideological and political objectives of professional courses, and combs the ideological and political elements of the course from the aspects of philosophical thinking and aesthetics, engineering ethics, the spirit of great country craftsmen, the feeling of serving the country with science and technology and the responsibility of mission, and explores the effective integration ways taking the bridge engineering course as an example, which can be used as a reference for similar courses.

    参考文献
    [1] 教育部.高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要[Z].教高[2020]3号,2020.
    [2] 张军锋,郭院成,黄亮,等.土木类专业结构力学课程思政教育探索与实践[J].许昌学院学报,2022,41(1):139-143.
    [3] 沈火明,刘娟.工程力学课程思政的探索与实践[J].高教学刊,2021,7(29):189-192.
    [4] 孙筠,朋茜.新工科背景下桥梁工程课程的思政实践与探索[J].浙江工商职业技术学院学报,2021,20(2):44-47.
    [5] 秦本东,蔺新艳,孟海平,等.新时代背景下结构力学课程思政的教学探索[J].大学教育,2021,10(6):54-57.
    [6] 教育部.普通高等学校本科专业目录(2020年版)[Z].教高[2020]2号,2020.
    [7] 教育部高等学校教学指导委员会.普通高等学校本科专业类教学质量国家标准[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2018.
    [8] 华南理工大学.学好力学走天下——王仕统教授力学讲座[N/OL].(2012-02-21)[2012-05-23],http://www2.scut. edu.cn/jtxs/2012/0521/c24238a348781/page.htm.
    [9] 中国工程教育认证协会.工程教育认证通用标准解读及使用指南(2020版,试行)[Z].工认协[2019]41号,2019.
    [10] 龙驭球.结构力学方法论的哲思回望[J].工程力学,2019,36(4):1-7.
    [11] 贺丽.以“桥梁工程”课程思政全面提高学生的综合素养[J].科教导刊,2021(23):145-147.
    [12] 徐腾飞,杨成,赵人达,等.土木工程专业课程思政的融入路径——以混凝土结构设计原理为例[J].高等建筑教育,2021,30(1):182-189.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

吴安杰,武艺,张志俊,刘振男,徐桂弘,何立.工学类专业课程思政元素及融入途径探讨——以桥梁工程课程为例[J].高等建筑教育,2024,33(1):158-165.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:263
  • 下载次数: 749
  • HTML阅读次数: 110
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2022-09-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-17
文章二维码