1.燕山大学，高等教育发展研究中心，河北 秦皇岛 066004;2.燕山大学，研究生院，河北 秦皇岛 066004;3.天津大学 教育学院，天津 300350
刘毳（1986—），女，燕山大学高等教育发展研究中心助理研究员、天津大学教育学院博士，主要从事高等教育管理研究，（E-mail）328300449@qq.com；
李兴国（1981—），男，燕山大学研究生院研究员，博士，主要从事大学评价与发展战略研究，（E-mail）lixingguo@you.edu.cn。
G640
2023年度国家社科基金教育学一般项目“行业特色大学一流学科建设的动力机制及优化路径研究”（BGA230252）
1.Higher Education Development Research Center, Yanshan University， Qinhuangdao 066004， P.R.China;2.Graduate School, Yanshan University， Qinhuangdao 066004， P.R.China;3.School of Education， Tianjin University， Tianjin 300350， P.R.China
改革政策对中国高等工程教育治理起到了决定性的主导作用。在政策的导向下，中国高等工程教育经历了治理思路由行政逻辑向学术逻辑的转变，治理目标从服务工业建设向支撑产业升级的转变，治理格局由自上而下向多元协同的转变，治理意蕴日益凸显，并取得了显著的治理成效。但我国工程教育仍存在治理理念待更新、协同治理机制不健全、监督评价机制缺失等治理困境，有待于通过优化流程、健全规范和反馈评估等途径进一步改进治理机制，提高治理效能。
The reform policy has played a decisive and pivotal role in the governance of higher engineering education in China. Under the guidance of policy, China's higher engineering education has transformed governance thinking, shifting from administrative logic to academic logic. The governance goal has also evolved from serving industrial construction to supporting industrial upgrading. Furthermore, there has been a shift in the governance pattern from top-down decision-making to multiple coordination. The implications of governance have become increasingly prominent, and remarkable achievements have been made. However, China's engineering education still has governance dilemmas such as the need to update governance concept, imperfect collaborative governance mechanism, and lack of supervision and evaluation mechanism. It needs to further improve governance mechanisms and efficiency through optimizing processes, perfecting norms, and feedback evaluation.
刘毳,马廷奇,李兴国.中国高等工程教育改革政策演进的治理意蕴[J].高等建筑教育,2024,33(4):1-8.
复制
