“国优计划”:高质量教师队伍建设的机遇、挑战与路径
作者:
作者单位:

华中师范大学 教育学院,湖北 武汉 430079

作者简介:

邹红军(1992—),男,华中师范大学教育学院副教授,教育学博士,主要从事教育基本理论、教育技术哲学研究,(E-mail)hzou023@163.com。

中图分类号:

G659.2

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金教育学2022年度青年项目“数字化时代的主体性危机与教育应对研究”(CAA220307)


National Excellence Program: opportunities, challenges, and strategies for building a high-quality teacher workforce
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Education, Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079, P.R.China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《关于实施国家优秀中小学教师培养计划的意见》的出台是我国高质量教师队伍建设新的政策机遇,推动了我国教育体系的发展、教师教育的提质和科学教育的优化,是进一步健全中国特色教师教育体系的有力举措。由于“国优计划”的突破性与创新性较强,政策实际施行过程中在研究生从教意愿、双学位多导师模式、“订单”培养教师地位和待遇方面仍面临着诸多现实挑战。通过增强学生教师职业认同、调动合作院校协同育人、提升用人单位优师观念等路径进一步优化政策内容,有助于保障“国优计划”实施效能,实现高素质中小学科学类教师培养的政策使命,促进我国教育的高质量发展。

    Abstract:

    The promulgation of the Opinions on the Implementation of the National Excellent Primary and Secondary School Teacher Training Plan presents a new policy opportunity for the construction of a high-quality teacher workforce in China. It has promoted the development of high-quality education, the improvement of teacher education quality, and the optimization of science education, serving as a strong measure to further enhance the teacher education system with Chinese characteristics. Due to its breakthrough and innovation,the practical implementation of the National Excellence Program still faces various challenges regarding the willingness of graduate students to engage in teaching, the dual-degree multi-supervisor model, the status and benefits of teachers trained through customized orders. In order to ensure the effectiveness of the National Excellence Program and the cultivation of high-quality science teachers in primary and secondary schools,and promote the high-quality development of education in China,it is suggested to optimize the policy content by enhancing students’ professional identity as teachers,fostering collaborative education among cooperative institutions,and promoting the concept of better treatment for teachers at educational institutions.

    参考文献
    [1] 习近平主持中央政治局第五次集体学习并发表重要讲话[EB/OL].(2023-05-29)[2023-11-29].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202305/content_6883632.html.
    [2] 教育部关于实施国家优秀中小学教师培养计划的意见[EB/OL].(2023-07-25)[2023-11-29].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/2023/issue_10726/202309/content_6906515.html.
    [3] 教育部等九部门关于印发《中西部欠发达地区优秀教师定向培养计划》的通知[EB/OL].(2021-08-02)[2023-11-29].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7011/202108/t20210803_548644.html.
    [4] 教育部等八部门关于印发《新时代基础教育强师计划》的通知[EB/OL].(2022-04-11)[2023-12-11].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/202204/t20220413_616644.html.
    [5] 2022年全国教育事业发展基本情况[EB/OL].(2023-03-23)[2023-12-11].http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2023/55167/sfcl/202303/t20230323_1052203.html.
    [6] 桑标,陆璟,李伟涛,等.在教育强国建设中提升教师队伍学历水平[J].教育研究,2023,44(9):31-38.
    [7] 顾明远,文东茅,陈时见.“国优计划”的政策导向与实施方略笔谈[J].教师教育学报,2023,10(5):1-10.
    [8] 熊丙奇.“双一流”培养中小学教师将改变什么[N].光明日报,2023-08-02(2).
    [9] 国务院关于基础教育改革与发展的决定[EB/OL].(2001-05-29)[2023-12-11].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201412/t20141217_181775.html.
    [10] 程建平,张志勇.高质量基础教育教师队伍建设的任务和路径[J].教育研究,2022,43(4):132-136.
    [11] 梅兵,唐玉光,荀渊.世界教师教育发展模式的演变及我国的选择[J].教师教育研究,2021,33(5):1-7.
    [12] 卢晓中.教育强国建设:教师教育当何为——兼论“国优计划”对师范院校的影响[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2023(5):107-118,243.
    [13] 王素,张永军,方勇,等.科学教育:大国博弈的前沿阵地——国际科学教育战略与发展路径研究[J].中国教育学刊,2022(10):25-31.
    [14] 郑永和,张登博,王莹莹,等.基础教育阶段的科学教育改革:需求、问题与对策[J].自然辩证法研究,2023,39(10):11-17.
    [15] 王晓生.小学科学教师队伍建设:价值使命、现实羁绊与实践路径[J].中国教育学刊,2023(6):91-95.
    [16] 张军,朱旭东.重构科学教师教育体系[J].教育研究,2023,44(6):27-35.
    [17] 王汭晴,曾天德,梁嘉欣.师范与非师范类小学初任教师职业认同感的比较[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2023,31(5):678-682.
    [18] 任永灿,郭元凯.教育实践满意度对师范生职业认同感的影响——心理资本和心理契约的链式中介模型[J].教师教育研究,2022,34(1):86-93.
    [19] Lamote C, Engels N. The development of student teachers’ professional identity[J].European Journal of Teacher Education,2010,33(1):3-18.
    [20] 代蕊华,阙粤红.“国优计划”的战略意义、现实挑战及未来着力点[J].教师教育研究,2023,35(5):10-15,9.
    [21] 孙慧芳,王钦忠,黄瑄,等.小学科学教师队伍专业发展现状及提升策略——基于对北京市2222名小学科学教师的调研分析[J].中小学管理,2023(6):34-37.
    [22] 陈富,郝鹏翔.我国教师工资及其位序的时空特征:1988—2018[J].教师教育研究,2022,34(1):32-39.
    [23] Assen J, Koops H, Meijers F, et al. How can a dialogue support teachers’ professional identity development? Harmonising multiple teacher I-positions[J].Teaching and Teacher Education,2018(73):130-140.
    [24] 燕连福.以教育家精神引领新时代教师队伍建设[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2023(10):46-52.
    [25] 吴叶林,徐涵,高凌希.教育家精神融入高校教师教育:逻辑、功能与模式[J].黑龙江高教研究,2023,41(4):1-7.
    [26] Kumar R, Hamer L. Preservice Teachers' Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Student Diversity and Proposed Instructional Practices: A Sequential Design Study[J].Journal of Teacher Education,2013,64(2):162-177.
    [27] Ifanti Amalia A, Fotopoulou Vasiliki S. Undergraduate students’ and teachers’ perceptions of professional development and identity formation: a case study in Greece[J].KEDI Journal of Educational Policy,2010,7(1):157-174.
    [28] 廖湘阳.双学位联合培养研究生:美国模式与中国思路[J].高等工程教育研究,2022(5):177-183.
    [29] Cavanna J M, Molloy Elreda L, Youngs P, et al. How methods instructors and program administrators promote teacher education program coherence[J].Journal of Teacher Education,2021,72(1):27-41.
    [30] Fang W, Clarke A, Wei Y. Empty success or brilliant failure: an analysis of Chinese students’ study abroad experience in a collaborative master of education program[J].Journal of Studies in International Education,2016,20(2):140-163.
    [31] 宋萑.新教师专业发展:从师徒带教走向专业学习社群[J].外国教育研究,2012,39(4):77-84.
    [32] Berry A, van Driel J H. Teaching about teaching science: aims, strategies, and backgrounds of science teacher educators[J].Journal of Teacher Education,2013,64(2):117-128.
    [33] 王晓燕.博士为何进中学——基于扎根理论的博士中学从教意愿影响因素研究[J].中国高教研究,2022(11):89-95.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

邹红军,王金妮.“国优计划”:高质量教师队伍建设的机遇、挑战与路径[J].高等建筑教育,2024,33(5):21-28.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:213
  • 下载次数: 207
  • HTML阅读次数: 241
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-18
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-25
文章二维码