从目标达成角度探讨工程专业课程如何融入思政元素——基于乔纳森建构学习环境模型的实践
作者:
作者单位:

重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045

作者简介:

王慧(1987—),女,重庆大学土木工程学院副教授,博士,主要从事道路检测与评价、交通基础设施信息管理与运维决策研究,(E-mail)mickysophy@cqu.edu.cn。

中图分类号:

G642

基金项目:

重庆大学专业教育示范工程第三批交通工程


Exploring how to integrate ideological and political education in engineering courses from the perspective of goal attainment: practice based on Jonathan’s model of constructive learning environment
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P.R.China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [19]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    既有工程教育体系缺少科学技术“价值理性”方面的教育,高校教师无论在思想还是行动上都存在工程教育与价值目标脱钩的情况。虽然课程思政的提出为工程伦理目标的达成提供了具体的内容范式,但是中国工程教育专业认证尚未融入本国特色和文化。基于建构主义学习理论,采用乔纳森建构学习环境模型解构《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》中课程思政的相关内容,从目标达成角度探讨思政育人目标如何融入工程教育认证标准毕业目标,并逐层拆解为课程育人目标,构建了面向产出的执行路径。以交通工程和路桥检测技术两门不同类型的土木工程专业课为例进行了案例分析,证实了该方法的可行性,为课程思政的实施提供参考。

    Abstract:

    The existing engineering education system lacks education on the value rationality of science and technology, and there is a disconnection between engineering education and value objectives in the mindset and actions of university teachers. The curriculum ideological and political education proposal has provided a concrete content paradigm for achieving ethical engineering objectives. Still, the professional certification of engineering education in China has not incorporated the content of national characteristics and culture. Based on constructivist learning theory, Jonathan’s constructive learning environment model is adopted to deconstruct the content of curriculum ideological and political education in the Guidance Outline for the Construction of Courses for Ideological and Political Education in Higher Education Institutions. Curriculum ideological and political education goals are integrated into the graduation goals of engineering education accreditation standards and dismantled into curriculum training goals layer by layer from the perspective of goal attainment. An output-oriented implementation path is constructed. Two different types of professional courses in civil engineering, namely traffic engineering and road and bridge detection technology, are taken as examples for the case study. The feasibility of the method is verified to provide a reference for the implementation of ideological and political education.

    参考文献
    [1] 钟波涛,吴海涛,陶婵娟,等.基于知识图谱的工程伦理教育研究现状述评[J].高等建筑教育,2020,29(2):122-129.
    [2] Zhu X M, Liu C L. Teacher training for moral education in China[J].Journal of Moral Education,2004,33(4):481-494.
    [3] 中国工程教育专业认证协会.工程教育认证标准[Z].2015.
    [4] 中国工程教育专业认证协会.工程教育认证标准[Z].2022.
    [5] 朱露,胡德鑫,何桢,等.国际工程教育专业认证体系的发展与改革——基于《华盛顿协议》与欧洲工程教育专业认证体系的对比分析[J].高等工程教育研究,2022(4):38-51.
    [6] 林健,衣芳青.面向未来的工程伦理教育[J].高等工程教育研究,2021(5):1-11.
    [7] 富海鹰,杨成,李丹妮,等.“三全育人视角下工科课程思政实践探究[J].高等工程教育研究,2021(5):94-99,165.
    [8] Jonassen D H,Howland J,Moore J,et al. Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective[M].2nd ed.Merrill:Prentice Hall,2003.
    [9] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL].(2020-05-28)[2022-05-22].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/06/content_5517606.htm.
    [10] Jia F L, Krettenauer T, Li L H. Moral identity in cultural context: Differences between Canadian and Chinese university students[J].Journal of Moral Education,2019,48(2):247-262.
    [11] 李妍.乔纳森建构主义学习环境设计研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007.
    [12] 李恒.工程伦理教育的关键机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2021.
    [13] Lawlor R. Teaching engineering ethics: a dissenting voice[J].Australasian Journal of Engineering Education,2021,26(1):38-46.
    [14] Aalberts J, Koster E, Boschhuizen R. From prejudice to reasonable judgement: integrating (moral) value discussions in university courses[J].Journal of Moral Education,2012,41(4):437-455.
    [15] 胡榕.建构主义在高等工程教育教学中的应用[J].长春大学学报,2021,31(4):78-82.
    [16] 张立,石岩,张洪萍,等.建构主义教学理念下的“数据结构”重点课程建设[J].计算机教育,2011(6):69-72.
    [17] 陈巍,陈国军,郁汉琪.建构主义理论的项目式教学体系构建[J].实验室研究与探索,2018,37(2):183-187,206.
    [18] 邱菡,张连成,李玉峰,等.基于建构主义和翻转课堂的信息安全专业课程教学[J].计算机教育,2016(2):69-72.
    [19] 王锐,白庆华,张国锋,等.基于建构主义的《管理信息系统》课程教学实践[J].现代教育技术,2009,19(S1):256-259
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王慧.从目标达成角度探讨工程专业课程如何融入思政元素——基于乔纳森建构学习环境模型的实践[J].高等建筑教育,2024,33(5):195-203.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2022-09-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-25
文章二维码